assyria: was similar to city-states in mesopotamia

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents country
Weight: 0.53
, nation
Weight: 0.48
, kingdom
Weight: 0.47
, civilization
Weight: 0.47
, culture
Weight: 0.43
Siblings central african republic
Weight: 0.28
, central american country
Weight: 0.27
, czech republic
Weight: 0.27
, west germany
Weight: 0.27
, region
Weight: 0.27

Related properties

Property Similarity
was similar to city-states in mesopotamia 1.00
was similar to city-states 1.00
was similar to other city-states in mesopotamia 0.97
was similar to other city-states 0.96
be same 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(assyria, was similar to city-states in mesopotamia)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(region, be same)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(assyria, was similar to city-states in mesopotamia)
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(region, be same)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(region, be same)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(assyria, was similar to city-states in mesopotamia)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(assyria, was similar to city-states in mesopotamia)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(assyria, was similar to city-states in mesopotamia)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(assyria, was similar to city-states)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(assyria, was similar to city-states in mesopotamia)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(assyria, was similar to other city-states)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(assyria, was similar to city-states in mesopotamia)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(assyria, was similar to other city-states)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(assyria, was similar to city-states in mesopotamia)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(assyria, was similar to city-states)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(assyria, was similar to city-states in mesopotamia)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(assyria, was similar to city-states)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(assyria, was similar to city-states in mesopotamia)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(assyria, was similar to city-states)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(assyria, was similar to city-states in mesopotamia)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(assyria, was similar to other city-states in mesopotamia)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(assyria, was similar to city-states in mesopotamia)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(assyria, was similar to other city-states)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(assyria, was similar to city-states in mesopotamia)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(assyria, was similar to other city-states)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(assyria, was similar to city-states in mesopotamia)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(assyria, was similar to other city-states in mesopotamia)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(assyria, was similar to city-states in mesopotamia)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(assyria, was similar to other city-states in mesopotamia)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(assyria, was similar to city-states in mesopotamia)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(assyria, was similar to other city-states in mesopotamia)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(assyria, was similar to city-states in mesopotamia)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(assyria, be same)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(assyria, was similar to city-states in mesopotamia)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(assyria, be same)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(assyria, was similar to city-states in mesopotamia)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(assyria, be same)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(assyria, was similar to city-states in mesopotamia)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(assyria, be same)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(assyria, was similar to city-states in mesopotamia)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(assyria, was similar to city-states in mesopotamia)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(assyria, was similar to city-states in mesopotamia)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(assyria, was similar to city-states in mesopotamia)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(assyria, was similar to city-states in mesopotamia)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(assyria, was similar to city-states in mesopotamia)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(region, be same)