astigmatism: get with age

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents condition
Weight: 0.61
, problem
Weight: 0.59
, aberration
Weight: 0.56
, distortion
Weight: 0.53
, contact lens
Weight: 0.51
Siblings glaucoma
Weight: 0.34
, macular degeneration
Weight: 0.34
, spondylolisthesis
Weight: 0.34
, thyroid problem
Weight: 0.34
, cystic fibrosis
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
get with age 1.00
work in age 0.93
work in 13th age 0.93
get over time 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(condition, work in 13th age) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(astigmatism, get with age)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(astigmatism, get with age) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(condition, work in 13th age)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(astigmatism, get with age) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(condition, work in 13th age)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(condition, work in 13th age) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(astigmatism, get with age) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(astigmatism, get with age)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(astigmatism, get with age) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(astigmatism, get with age)

Similarity expansion

0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(astigmatism, get with age) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(astigmatism, get over time)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(astigmatism, get with age) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(astigmatism, get over time)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(astigmatism, get with age) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(astigmatism, get over time)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(astigmatism, get with age) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(astigmatism, get over time)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(astigmatism, get with age) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(astigmatism, get with age) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(astigmatism, get with age)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(astigmatism, get with age) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(astigmatism, get with age)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(astigmatism, get with age) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(condition, work in 13th age)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(astigmatism, get with age) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(condition, work in 13th age)