astigmatism: work

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents condition
Weight: 0.61
, problem
Weight: 0.59
, aberration
Weight: 0.56
, distortion
Weight: 0.53
, contact lens
Weight: 0.51
Siblings glaucoma
Weight: 0.34
, macular degeneration
Weight: 0.34
, spondylolisthesis
Weight: 0.34
, thyroid problem
Weight: 0.34
, cystic fibrosis
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
work 1.00
has work 0.92
be supposed work 0.79
work in age 0.77
work in 13th age 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.62
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(condition, work)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(astigmatism, work)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(distortion, work)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(astigmatism, work)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(contact lens, has work)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(astigmatism, work)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(condition, work in 13th age)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(astigmatism, work)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(distortion, be supposed work)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(astigmatism, work)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(astigmatism, work)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(distortion, work)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(astigmatism, work)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(condition, work)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(astigmatism, work)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(distortion, be supposed work)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(astigmatism, work)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(contact lens, has work)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(astigmatism, work)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(condition, work in 13th age)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(astigmatism, work)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(condition, work in 13th age)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(astigmatism, work)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(condition, work)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(astigmatism, work)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(distortion, be supposed work)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(astigmatism, work)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(distortion, work)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(astigmatism, work)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(contact lens, has work)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(astigmatism, work)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(glaucoma, work)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(condition, work)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(astigmatism, work)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(astigmatism, work)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(distortion, work)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(astigmatism, work)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(astigmatism, work)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(contact lens, has work)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(astigmatism, work)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(astigmatism, work)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(distortion, be supposed work)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(astigmatism, work)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(astigmatism, work)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(condition, work in 13th age)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(astigmatism, work)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(astigmatism, work)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(astigmatism, work)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(glaucoma, work)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(glaucoma, work)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(astigmatism, work)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(astigmatism, work)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(astigmatism, work)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(astigmatism, work)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(astigmatism, work)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(astigmatism, work)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(astigmatism, work)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(astigmatism, work)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(distortion, work)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(astigmatism, work)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(distortion, be supposed work)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(astigmatism, work)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(condition, work)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(astigmatism, work)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(contact lens, has work)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(astigmatism, work)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(condition, work in 13th age)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(astigmatism, work)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(glaucoma, work)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(astigmatism, work)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(distortion, work)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(astigmatism, work)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(distortion, be supposed work)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(astigmatism, work)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(condition, work)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(astigmatism, work)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(contact lens, has work)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(astigmatism, work)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(condition, work in 13th age)