athlete: bathe in ice

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents individual
Weight: 0.63
, artist
Weight: 0.61
, injury
Weight: 0.59
Siblings football player
Weight: 0.80
, hockey player
Weight: 0.79
, wrestler
Weight: 0.78
, tennis player
Weight: 0.78
, gymnast
Weight: 0.76

Related properties

Property Similarity
bathe in ice 1.00
bathe in water 0.94
bathe in cold water 0.94
have ice bath 0.85
sit in ice baths 0.85
do ice baths 0.85
get in ice baths 0.84
take ice baths 0.84
get ice baths 0.84
use ice baths 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(athlete, bathe in ice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(gymnast, sit in ice baths)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(athlete, bathe in ice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(gymnast, take ice baths)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(athlete, bathe in ice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(gymnast, sit in ice baths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(gymnast, sit in ice baths)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(athlete, bathe in ice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(gymnast, take ice baths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(gymnast, take ice baths)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(athlete, bathe in ice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(athlete, bathe in ice)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(athlete, bathe in ice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(athlete, bathe in water)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(athlete, bathe in ice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(athlete, bathe in water)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(athlete, bathe in ice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(athlete, bathe in water)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(athlete, bathe in ice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(athlete, bathe in water)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(athlete, bathe in ice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(athlete, bathe in ice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(athlete, bathe in ice)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(athlete, bathe in ice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(athlete, bathe in ice)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(athlete, bathe in ice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(gymnast, sit in ice baths)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(athlete, bathe in ice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(gymnast, take ice baths)