athlete: be very competitive

Related concepts

Parents	individual Weight: 0.63 , artist Weight: 0.61 , injury Weight: 0.59 , competitor Weight: 0.58
Siblings	football player Weight: 0.80 , hockey player Weight: 0.79 , wrestler Weight: 0.78 , tennis player Weight: 0.78 , gymnast Weight: 0.76

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be very competitive	1.00
lose competition to good competitor	0.82
be very important	0.78
lose competition	0.77
be compete	0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.36

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.45

Plausible(competitor, lose competition to good competitor) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Typical(athlete, be very competitive)

0.22

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.07

Plausible(artist, be very important) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Typical(athlete, be very competitive)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.06

Plausible(athlete, be very competitive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Plausible(artist, be very important)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.06

Plausible(athlete, be very competitive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Plausible(competitor, lose competition to good competitor)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.32

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(athlete, be very competitive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Remarkable(competitor, lose competition to good competitor)

0.26

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(athlete, be very competitive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Remarkable(artist, be very important)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.45

Plausible(competitor, lose competition to good competitor) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

Remarkable(athlete, be very competitive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Plausible(athlete, be very competitive)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.07

Plausible(artist, be very important) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

Remarkable(athlete, be very competitive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Plausible(athlete, be very competitive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.11

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.06

Plausible(athlete, be very competitive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Salient(athlete, be very competitive)

Similarity expansion

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.63

Typical(athlete, be very competitive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Typical(athlete, be compete)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.06

Plausible(athlete, be very competitive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Plausible(athlete, lose competition)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.72

Remarkable(athlete, be very competitive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Remarkable(athlete, lose competition)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.63

Salient(athlete, be very competitive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Salient(athlete, lose competition)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.63

Typical(athlete, be very competitive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Typical(athlete, lose competition)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.72

Remarkable(athlete, be very competitive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(athlete, be compete)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.63

Salient(athlete, be very competitive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Salient(athlete, be compete)

0.29

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.06

Plausible(athlete, be very competitive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Plausible(athlete, be compete)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.63

Salient(athlete, be very competitive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Typical(athlete, be very competitive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(athlete, be very competitive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.20

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.06

Plausible(athlete, be very competitive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Typical(athlete, be very competitive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.22

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(athlete, be very competitive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Typical(artist, be very important)

0.20

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(athlete, be very competitive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Typical(competitor, lose competition to good competitor)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.63

Typical(athlete, be very competitive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Typical(competitor, lose competition to good competitor)

0.29

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.63

Typical(athlete, be very competitive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Typical(artist, be very important)