athlete: carrying out training

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents individual
Weight: 0.63
, artist
Weight: 0.61
, injury
Weight: 0.59
, competitor
Weight: 0.58
Siblings football player
Weight: 0.80
, hockey player
Weight: 0.79
, wrestler
Weight: 0.78
, tennis player
Weight: 0.78
, gymnast
Weight: 0.76

Related properties

Property Similarity
carrying out training 1.00
eat during training 0.82
engage in training 0.78
lie after training 0.77
engage in cross training 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(athlete, carrying out training)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(athlete, carrying out training)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(athlete, carrying out training)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(athlete, eat during training)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(athlete, carrying out training)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(athlete, eat during training)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(athlete, carrying out training)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(athlete, eat during training)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(athlete, carrying out training)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(athlete, eat during training)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(athlete, carrying out training)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(athlete, lie after training)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(athlete, carrying out training)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(athlete, lie after training)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(athlete, carrying out training)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(athlete, lie after training)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(athlete, carrying out training)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(athlete, lie after training)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(athlete, carrying out training)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(athlete, carrying out training)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(athlete, carrying out training)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(athlete, carrying out training)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(athlete, carrying out training)