athlete: wear green

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents individual
Weight: 0.63
, artist
Weight: 0.61
, injury
Weight: 0.59
Siblings football player
Weight: 0.80
, hockey player
Weight: 0.79
, wrestler
Weight: 0.78
, tennis player
Weight: 0.78
, gymnast
Weight: 0.76

Related properties

Property Similarity
wear green 1.00
wear blue 0.89
wear yellow 0.89
wear orange 0.87
have wear 0.86
wear black 0.86
need wear 0.83
wear little 0.83
wear yellow ribbons 0.82
wear bright shoes 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(artist, wear black)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(athlete, wear green)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(athlete, wear green)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(artist, wear black)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(athlete, wear green)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(artist, wear black)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(athlete, wear green)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(football player, wear black)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(athlete, wear green)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(tennis player, have wear)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(artist, wear black)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(athlete, wear green)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(athlete, wear green)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(athlete, wear green)
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(tennis player, have wear)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(tennis player, have wear)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(athlete, wear green)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(football player, wear black)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(football player, wear black)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(athlete, wear green)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(athlete, wear green)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(athlete, wear green)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(athlete, wear blue)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(athlete, wear green)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(athlete, wear yellow)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(athlete, wear green)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(athlete, wear blue)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(athlete, wear green)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(athlete, wear yellow)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(athlete, wear green)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(athlete, wear orange)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(athlete, wear green)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(athlete, wear orange)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(athlete, wear green)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(athlete, wear blue)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(athlete, wear green)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(athlete, wear yellow)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(athlete, wear green)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(athlete, wear orange)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(athlete, wear green)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(athlete, wear orange)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(athlete, wear green)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(athlete, wear blue)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(athlete, wear green)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(athlete, wear yellow)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(athlete, wear green)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(athlete, wear green)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(athlete, wear green)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(athlete, wear green)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(athlete, wear green)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(athlete, wear green)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(artist, wear black)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(athlete, wear green)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(tennis player, have wear)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(athlete, wear green)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(football player, wear black)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(athlete, wear green)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(artist, wear black)