athlete: well in game

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents individual
Weight: 0.63
, artist
Weight: 0.61
, injury
Weight: 0.59
, competitor
Weight: 0.58
Siblings football player
Weight: 0.80
, hockey player
Weight: 0.79
, wrestler
Weight: 0.78
, tennis player
Weight: 0.78
, gymnast
Weight: 0.76

Related properties

Property Similarity
well in game 1.00
be at soccer game 0.80
lose game 0.80
be at hockey game 0.79
win match 0.78
be at play football 0.78
fall down while play 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(injury, be at hockey game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(athlete, well in game)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(injury, be at play football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(athlete, well in game)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(athlete, well in game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(injury, be at play football)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(athlete, well in game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(injury, be at hockey game)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(athlete, well in game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(injury, be at hockey game)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(athlete, well in game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(injury, be at play football)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(athlete, well in game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(football player, be at soccer game)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(athlete, well in game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(tennis player, fall down while play)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(athlete, well in game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(tennis player, win match)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(athlete, well in game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(hockey player, be at hockey game)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(injury, be at hockey game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(athlete, well in game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(athlete, well in game)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(injury, be at play football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(athlete, well in game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(athlete, well in game)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(athlete, well in game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(tennis player, win match) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(tennis player, win match)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(athlete, well in game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(tennis player, fall down while play) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(tennis player, fall down while play)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(athlete, well in game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(hockey player, be at hockey game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(hockey player, be at hockey game)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(athlete, well in game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(football player, be at soccer game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(football player, be at soccer game)

Salient implies Plausible

0.12
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(athlete, well in game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(athlete, well in game)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(athlete, well in game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(athlete, lose game)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(athlete, well in game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(athlete, lose game)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(athlete, well in game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(athlete, lose game)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(athlete, well in game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(athlete, lose game)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(athlete, well in game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(athlete, well in game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(athlete, well in game)

Typical implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(athlete, well in game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(athlete, well in game)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(athlete, well in game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(injury, be at play football)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(athlete, well in game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(injury, be at hockey game)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(athlete, well in game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(hockey player, be at hockey game)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(athlete, well in game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(football player, be at soccer game)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(athlete, well in game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(tennis player, win match)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(athlete, well in game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(tennis player, fall down while play)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(athlete, well in game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(injury, be at play football)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(athlete, well in game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(injury, be at hockey game)