atomic number: be considered more appropriate

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents information
Weight: 0.54
, property
Weight: 0.48
Siblings military intelligence
Weight: 0.31
, computer database
Weight: 0.31
, historical site
Weight: 0.30
, telephone numbers
Weight: 0.30
, intelligence
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered more appropriate 1.00
be considered appropriate 0.98
be most appropriate parameter for classification 0.80
is more important 0.79
be most appropriate parameter for classification of elements 0.79
be considered vital 0.77
be relevant 0.76
is relevant 0.76
be important in organisation 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(atomic number, be considered more appropriate)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(intelligence, is more important)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(atomic number, be considered more appropriate)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(intelligence, is more important)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(intelligence, is more important)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(atomic number, be considered more appropriate)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(atomic number, be considered more appropriate)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(atomic number, be considered more appropriate)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(atomic number, be most appropriate parameter for classification)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(atomic number, be considered more appropriate)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(atomic number, be most appropriate parameter for classification of elements)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(atomic number, be considered more appropriate)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(atomic number, be most appropriate parameter for classification of elements)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(atomic number, be considered more appropriate)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(atomic number, be most appropriate parameter for classification)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(atomic number, be considered more appropriate)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(atomic number, be most appropriate parameter for classification of elements)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(atomic number, be considered more appropriate)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(atomic number, be most appropriate parameter for classification)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(atomic number, be considered more appropriate)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(atomic number, be most appropriate parameter for classification of elements)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(atomic number, be considered more appropriate)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(atomic number, be most appropriate parameter for classification)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(atomic number, be considered more appropriate)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(atomic number, be considered more appropriate)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(atomic number, be considered more appropriate)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(atomic number, be considered more appropriate)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(atomic number, be considered more appropriate)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(atomic number, be considered more appropriate)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(intelligence, is more important)