atomic number: be most appropriate parameter for classification

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents information
Weight: 0.54
, property
Weight: 0.48
Siblings military intelligence
Weight: 0.31
, computer database
Weight: 0.31
, historical site
Weight: 0.30
, telephone numbers
Weight: 0.30
, intelligence
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
be most appropriate parameter for classification 1.00
be most appropriate parameter for classification of elements 0.98
be about relationships useful in classification 0.82
be considered appropriate 0.81
be considered more appropriate 0.80
be about evolutionary relationships useful in classification 0.79
be better bases for classification of elements 0.79
be about relationships useful in classifications 0.77
be about evolutionary relationships useful in classifications 0.76
be useful classifying 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(property, be useful classifying) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(atomic number, be most appropriate parameter for classification)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(atomic number, be most appropriate parameter for classification) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(property, be useful classifying)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(atomic number, be most appropriate parameter for classification) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(property, be useful classifying)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(property, be useful classifying) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(atomic number, be most appropriate parameter for classification) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(atomic number, be most appropriate parameter for classification)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(atomic number, be most appropriate parameter for classification) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(atomic number, be most appropriate parameter for classification)

Similarity expansion

0.83
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(atomic number, be most appropriate parameter for classification) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(atomic number, be most appropriate parameter for classification of elements)
0.83
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(atomic number, be most appropriate parameter for classification) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(atomic number, be most appropriate parameter for classification of elements)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(atomic number, be most appropriate parameter for classification) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(atomic number, be most appropriate parameter for classification of elements)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(atomic number, be most appropriate parameter for classification) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(atomic number, be considered more appropriate)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(atomic number, be most appropriate parameter for classification) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(atomic number, be considered more appropriate)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(atomic number, be most appropriate parameter for classification) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(atomic number, be better bases for classification of elements)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(atomic number, be most appropriate parameter for classification) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(atomic number, be most appropriate parameter for classification of elements)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(atomic number, be most appropriate parameter for classification) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(atomic number, be considered more appropriate)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(atomic number, be most appropriate parameter for classification) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(atomic number, be better bases for classification of elements)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(atomic number, be most appropriate parameter for classification) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(atomic number, be considered more appropriate)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(atomic number, be most appropriate parameter for classification) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(atomic number, be better bases for classification of elements)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(atomic number, be most appropriate parameter for classification) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(atomic number, be better bases for classification of elements)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(atomic number, be most appropriate parameter for classification) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(atomic number, be most appropriate parameter for classification) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(atomic number, be most appropriate parameter for classification)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(atomic number, be most appropriate parameter for classification) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(atomic number, be most appropriate parameter for classification)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(atomic number, be most appropriate parameter for classification) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(property, be useful classifying)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.12
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(atomic number, be most appropriate parameter for classification) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(property, be useful classifying)