atomic number: increase down group

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents information
Weight: 0.54
, property
Weight: 0.48
Siblings military intelligence
Weight: 0.31
, computer database
Weight: 0.31
, historical site
Weight: 0.30
, telephone numbers
Weight: 0.30
, intelligence
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
increase down group 1.00
increases down group 0.94
be reduced for for 60s 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(property, be reduced for for 60s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(atomic number, increase down group)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(atomic number, increase down group) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(property, be reduced for for 60s)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(atomic number, increase down group) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(property, be reduced for for 60s)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(property, be reduced for for 60s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(atomic number, increase down group) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(atomic number, increase down group)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(atomic number, increase down group) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(atomic number, increase down group)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(atomic number, increase down group) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(atomic number, increases down group)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(atomic number, increase down group) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(atomic number, increases down group)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(atomic number, increase down group) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(atomic number, increases down group)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(atomic number, increase down group) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(atomic number, increases down group)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(atomic number, increase down group) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(atomic number, increase down group) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(atomic number, increase down group)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(atomic number, increase down group) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(atomic number, increase down group)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(atomic number, increase down group) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(property, be reduced for for 60s)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(atomic number, increase down group) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(property, be reduced for for 60s)