attach case: be at lawyer office

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents -
Siblings -

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at lawyer office 1.00
be at office 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(attach case, be at lawyer office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(attach case, be at lawyer office)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(attach case, be at lawyer office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(attach case, be at office)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(attach case, be at lawyer office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(attach case, be at office)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(attach case, be at lawyer office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(attach case, be at office)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(attach case, be at lawyer office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(attach case, be at office)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(attach case, be at lawyer office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(attach case, be at lawyer office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(attach case, be at lawyer office)

Typical implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(attach case, be at lawyer office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(attach case, be at lawyer office)