attache case: be at office

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents -
Siblings -

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at office 1.00
be at lawyer office 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(attache case, be at office)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(attache case, be at office)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(attache case, be at office)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(attache case, be at lawyer office)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(attache case, be at office)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(attache case, be at lawyer office)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(attache case, be at office)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(attache case, be at lawyer office)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(attache case, be at office)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(attache case, be at lawyer office)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(attache case, be at office)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(attache case, be at office)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(attache case, be at office)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(attache case, be at office)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(attache case, be at office)