attachment: has state relationship

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents application
Weight: 0.67
, item
Weight: 0.63
, object
Weight: 0.61
, documentation
Weight: 0.60
Siblings tiller
Weight: 0.57
, velcro
Weight: 0.53
, lanyard
Weight: 0.53
, flange
Weight: 0.52
, dough
Weight: 0.50

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state relationship 1.00
is two way relationship 0.91
be described as relationship 0.86
be described as two-way relationship 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(attachment, has state relationship)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(attachment, has state relationship)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(attachment, has state relationship)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(attachment, is two way relationship)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(attachment, has state relationship)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(attachment, is two way relationship)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(attachment, has state relationship)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(attachment, is two way relationship)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(attachment, has state relationship)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(attachment, be described as relationship)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(attachment, has state relationship)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(attachment, be described as two-way relationship)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(attachment, has state relationship)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(attachment, be described as relationship)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(attachment, has state relationship)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(attachment, be described as two-way relationship)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(attachment, has state relationship)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(attachment, be described as relationship)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(attachment, has state relationship)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(attachment, be described as two-way relationship)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(attachment, has state relationship)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(attachment, is two way relationship)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(attachment, has state relationship)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(attachment, be described as relationship)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(attachment, has state relationship)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(attachment, be described as two-way relationship)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(attachment, has state relationship)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(attachment, has state relationship)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(attachment, has state relationship)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(attachment, has state relationship)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(attachment, has state relationship)