attack: be used in football

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents move
Weight: 0.60
, command
Weight: 0.60
, atrocity
Weight: 0.59
, challenge
Weight: 0.58
Siblings blast
Weight: 0.63
, assault
Weight: 0.62
, counterattack
Weight: 0.62
, shooting
Weight: 0.61
, strike
Weight: 0.61

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used in football 1.00
be in football 0.96
be in basketball 0.83
work for tennis 0.75
be in sport 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(challenge, work for tennis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(attack, be used in football)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(challenge, be in sport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(attack, be used in football)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(attack, be used in football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(challenge, be in sport)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(attack, be used in football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(challenge, work for tennis)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(attack, be used in football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(challenge, work for tennis)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(attack, be used in football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(challenge, be in sport)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(attack, be used in football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(shooting, be in football)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(attack, be used in football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(shooting, be in basketball)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(challenge, work for tennis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(attack, be used in football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(attack, be used in football)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(challenge, be in sport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(attack, be used in football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(attack, be used in football)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(attack, be used in football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(shooting, be in football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(shooting, be in football)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(attack, be used in football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(shooting, be in basketball) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(shooting, be in basketball)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(attack, be used in football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(attack, be used in football)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(attack, be used in football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(attack, be used in football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(attack, be used in football)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(attack, be used in football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(attack, be used in football)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(attack, be used in football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(challenge, be in sport)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(attack, be used in football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(challenge, work for tennis)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(attack, be used in football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(shooting, be in football)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(attack, be used in football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(shooting, be in basketball)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(attack, be used in football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(challenge, be in sport)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(attack, be used in football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(challenge, work for tennis)