attorney: wear white wigs

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents defense attorney
Weight: 0.74
, agent
Weight: 0.62
, office
Weight: 0.62
, witness
Weight: 0.61
Siblings partner
Weight: 0.65
, prosecutor
Weight: 0.62
, associate
Weight: 0.59
, paralegal
Weight: 0.57
, solicitor
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
wear white wigs 1.00
wear wigs 0.98
wear wigs in court 0.93
be in uk wear wigs 0.91
wear wigs in england 0.90
be in england wear wigs 0.90
wear hair 0.87
wear black 0.87
wear long hair 0.85
wear suits 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(agent, wear suits)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(attorney, wear white wigs)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(attorney, wear white wigs)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(agent, wear suits)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(attorney, wear white wigs)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(agent, wear suits)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(attorney, wear white wigs)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(solicitor, wear wigs)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(attorney, wear white wigs)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(prosecutor, wear wigs)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(attorney, wear white wigs)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(solicitor, be in england wear wigs)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(attorney, wear white wigs)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(solicitor, wear black)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(agent, wear suits)
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(attorney, wear white wigs)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(attorney, wear white wigs)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(attorney, wear white wigs)
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(solicitor, wear wigs)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(solicitor, wear wigs)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(attorney, wear white wigs)
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(prosecutor, wear wigs)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(prosecutor, wear wigs)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(attorney, wear white wigs)
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(solicitor, be in england wear wigs)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(solicitor, be in england wear wigs)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(attorney, wear white wigs)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(solicitor, wear black)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(solicitor, wear black)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(attorney, wear white wigs)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(attorney, wear white wigs)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(attorney, wear white wigs)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(attorney, wear wigs)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(attorney, wear white wigs)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(attorney, wear wigs)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(attorney, wear white wigs)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(attorney, wear wigs)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(attorney, wear white wigs)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(attorney, wear wigs in court)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(attorney, wear white wigs)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(attorney, wear wigs in court)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(attorney, wear white wigs)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(attorney, wear wigs in court)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(attorney, wear white wigs)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(attorney, wear wigs)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(attorney, wear white wigs)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(attorney, be in england wear wigs)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(attorney, wear white wigs)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(attorney, be in uk wear wigs)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(attorney, wear white wigs)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(attorney, be in england wear wigs)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(attorney, wear white wigs)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(attorney, be in uk wear wigs)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(attorney, wear white wigs)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(attorney, be in england wear wigs)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(attorney, wear white wigs)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(attorney, be in uk wear wigs)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(attorney, wear white wigs)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(attorney, wear wigs in england)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(attorney, wear white wigs)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(attorney, wear wigs in england)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(attorney, wear white wigs)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(attorney, wear wigs in england)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(attorney, wear white wigs)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(attorney, wear wigs in court)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(attorney, wear white wigs)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(attorney, be in england wear wigs)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(attorney, wear white wigs)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(attorney, wear wigs in england)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(attorney, wear white wigs)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(attorney, be in uk wear wigs)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(attorney, wear white wigs)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(attorney, wear hair)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(attorney, wear white wigs)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(attorney, wear long hair)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(attorney, wear white wigs)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(attorney, wear hair)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(attorney, wear white wigs)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(attorney, wear hair)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(attorney, wear white wigs)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(attorney, wear long hair)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(attorney, wear white wigs)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(attorney, wear long hair)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(attorney, wear white wigs)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(attorney, wear long hair)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(attorney, wear white wigs)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(attorney, wear hair)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(attorney, wear white wigs)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(attorney, wear white wigs)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(attorney, wear white wigs)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(attorney, wear white wigs)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(attorney, wear white wigs)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(attorney, wear white wigs)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(agent, wear suits)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(attorney, wear white wigs)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(solicitor, wear wigs)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(attorney, wear white wigs)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(prosecutor, wear wigs)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(attorney, wear white wigs)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(solicitor, be in england wear wigs)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(attorney, wear white wigs)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(solicitor, wear black)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(attorney, wear white wigs)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(agent, wear suits)