attorney: wear wigs in court

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents defense attorney
Weight: 0.74
, agent
Weight: 0.62
, office
Weight: 0.62
, witness
Weight: 0.61
Siblings partner
Weight: 0.65
, prosecutor
Weight: 0.62
, associate
Weight: 0.59
, paralegal
Weight: 0.57
, solicitor
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
wear wigs in court 1.00
wear wigs 0.94
wear white wigs 0.93
be in uk wear wigs 0.88
be in england wear wigs 0.86
wear wigs in england 0.86
wear hair 0.82
wear long hair 0.81
wear suits 0.81
wear sunglasses 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(agent, wear sunglasses)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(attorney, wear wigs in court)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(agent, wear suits)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(attorney, wear wigs in court)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(attorney, wear wigs in court)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(agent, wear suits)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(attorney, wear wigs in court)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(agent, wear sunglasses)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(attorney, wear wigs in court)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(agent, wear suits)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(attorney, wear wigs in court)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(agent, wear sunglasses)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(attorney, wear wigs in court)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(solicitor, wear wigs)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(attorney, wear wigs in court)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(prosecutor, wear wigs)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(attorney, wear wigs in court)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(solicitor, be in england wear wigs)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(agent, wear suits)
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(attorney, wear wigs in court)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(attorney, wear wigs in court)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(agent, wear sunglasses)
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(attorney, wear wigs in court)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(attorney, wear wigs in court)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(attorney, wear wigs in court)
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(solicitor, wear wigs)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(solicitor, wear wigs)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(attorney, wear wigs in court)
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(prosecutor, wear wigs)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(prosecutor, wear wigs)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(attorney, wear wigs in court)
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(solicitor, be in england wear wigs)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(solicitor, be in england wear wigs)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(attorney, wear wigs in court)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(attorney, wear wigs in court)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(attorney, wear wigs in court)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(attorney, wear wigs)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(attorney, wear wigs in court)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(attorney, wear wigs)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(attorney, wear wigs in court)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(attorney, wear wigs)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(attorney, wear wigs in court)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(attorney, be in england wear wigs)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(attorney, wear wigs in court)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(attorney, be in england wear wigs)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(attorney, wear wigs in court)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(attorney, be in england wear wigs)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(attorney, wear wigs in court)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(attorney, be in uk wear wigs)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(attorney, wear wigs in court)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(attorney, be in uk wear wigs)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(attorney, wear wigs in court)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(attorney, be in uk wear wigs)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(attorney, wear wigs in court)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(attorney, wear wigs in england)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(attorney, wear wigs in court)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(attorney, wear wigs in england)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(attorney, wear wigs in court)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(attorney, wear wigs in england)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(attorney, wear wigs in court)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(attorney, be in england wear wigs)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(attorney, wear wigs in court)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(attorney, wear wigs)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(attorney, wear wigs in court)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(attorney, be in uk wear wigs)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(attorney, wear wigs in court)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(attorney, wear white wigs)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(attorney, wear wigs in court)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(attorney, wear wigs in england)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(attorney, wear wigs in court)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(attorney, wear hair)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(attorney, wear wigs in court)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(attorney, wear long hair)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(attorney, wear wigs in court)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(attorney, wear hair)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(attorney, wear wigs in court)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(attorney, wear hair)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(attorney, wear wigs in court)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(attorney, wear hair)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(attorney, wear wigs in court)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(attorney, wear white wigs)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(attorney, wear wigs in court)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(attorney, wear long hair)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(attorney, wear wigs in court)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(attorney, wear white wigs)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(attorney, wear wigs in court)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(attorney, wear white wigs)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(attorney, wear wigs in court)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(attorney, wear long hair)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(attorney, wear wigs in court)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(attorney, wear long hair)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(attorney, wear wigs in court)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(attorney, wear wigs in court)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(attorney, wear wigs in court)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(attorney, wear wigs in court)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(attorney, wear wigs in court)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(attorney, wear wigs in court)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(agent, wear suits)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(attorney, wear wigs in court)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(agent, wear sunglasses)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(attorney, wear wigs in court)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(solicitor, wear wigs)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(attorney, wear wigs in court)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(prosecutor, wear wigs)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(attorney, wear wigs in court)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(solicitor, be in england wear wigs)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(attorney, wear wigs in court)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(agent, wear suits)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(attorney, wear wigs in court)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(agent, wear sunglasses)