attraction: be important to tourism

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.67
, issue
Weight: 0.64
, thing
Weight: 0.63
, element
Weight: 0.62
, emotion
Weight: 0.61
Siblings zoo
Weight: 0.64
, carousel
Weight: 0.63
, pier
Weight: 0.63

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important to tourism 1.00
be important in tourism 1.00
bringing tourist to tourist destination 0.86
be for tourists 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(attraction, be important to tourism)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(attraction, be important to tourism)

Similarity expansion

0.84
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(attraction, be important to tourism)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(attraction, be important in tourism)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(attraction, be important to tourism)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(attraction, be important in tourism)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(attraction, be important to tourism)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(attraction, bringing tourist to tourist destination)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(attraction, be important to tourism)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(attraction, be important in tourism)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(attraction, be important to tourism)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(attraction, bringing tourist to tourist destination)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(attraction, be important to tourism)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(attraction, be for tourists)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(attraction, be important to tourism)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(attraction, be important in tourism)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(attraction, be important to tourism)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(attraction, bringing tourist to tourist destination)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(attraction, be important to tourism)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(attraction, be for tourists)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(attraction, be important to tourism)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(attraction, be for tourists)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(attraction, be important to tourism)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(attraction, be for tourists)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(attraction, be important to tourism)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(attraction, bringing tourist to tourist destination)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(attraction, be important to tourism)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(attraction, be important to tourism)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(attraction, be important to tourism)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(attraction, be important to tourism)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(attraction, be important to tourism)