auburn: have tiger

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents university
Weight: 0.58
, college
Weight: 0.57
, town
Weight: 0.57
, school
Weight: 0.55
Siblings cambridge
Weight: 0.32
, brown
Weight: 0.32
, oxford
Weight: 0.32
, alabama
Weight: 0.32
, tennessee
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
have tiger 1.00
have tigers 0.91
be tigers 0.90
is tigers 0.90
be called tigers 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(auburn, have tiger)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(auburn, have tiger)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(auburn, have tiger)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(auburn, is tigers)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(auburn, have tiger)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(auburn, is tigers)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(auburn, have tiger)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(auburn, be tigers)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(auburn, have tiger)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(auburn, is tigers)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(auburn, have tiger)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(auburn, be tigers)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(auburn, have tiger)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(auburn, is tigers)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(auburn, have tiger)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(auburn, be tigers)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(auburn, have tiger)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(auburn, have tigers)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(auburn, have tiger)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(auburn, be tigers)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(auburn, have tiger)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(auburn, have tigers)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(auburn, have tiger)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(auburn, have tigers)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(auburn, have tiger)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(auburn, be called tigers)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(auburn, have tiger)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(auburn, be called tigers)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(auburn, have tiger)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(auburn, be called tigers)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(auburn, have tiger)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(auburn, be called tigers)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(auburn, have tiger)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(auburn, have tigers)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(auburn, have tiger)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(auburn, have tiger)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(auburn, have tiger)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(auburn, have tiger)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(auburn, have tiger)