auction: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents sale
Weight: 0.68
, competition
Weight: 0.64
, event
Weight: 0.61
, publication
Weight: 0.56
Siblings ebay
Weight: 0.63
, gala
Weight: 0.33
, purchase
Weight: 0.32
, wedding reception
Weight: 0.32
, exhibition
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
has quality use 0.88
be good for buisinesses 0.85
CAN good 0.81
be good in life 0.80
be in business good 0.79
has quality shit 0.79
is good thing 0.78
be in market good 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(competition, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(auction, has quality good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(sale, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(auction, has quality good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(competition, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(auction, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(competition, be good for buisinesses)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(auction, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(sale, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(auction, has quality good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(competition, be in market good)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(auction, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(auction, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(sale, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(auction, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(sale, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(auction, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(competition, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(auction, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(competition, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(auction, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(competition, be good for buisinesses)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(auction, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(competition, be in market good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(auction, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(sale, has quality bad)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(auction, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(competition, has quality bad)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(auction, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(sale, has quality good)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(auction, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(competition, has quality good)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(auction, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(competition, be good for buisinesses)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(auction, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(competition, be in market good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(auction, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(exhibition, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(auction, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(ebay, has quality use)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(auction, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(gala, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(competition, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(auction, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(auction, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(sale, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(auction, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(auction, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(competition, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(auction, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(auction, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(sale, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(auction, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(auction, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(competition, be good for buisinesses)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(auction, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(auction, has quality good)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(competition, be in market good)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(auction, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(auction, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(auction, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(gala, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(gala, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(auction, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(exhibition, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(exhibition, has quality good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(auction, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(ebay, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(ebay, has quality use)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(auction, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(auction, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(auction, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(auction, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(auction, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(auction, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(auction, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(auction, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(competition, be in market good)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(auction, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(sale, has quality good)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(auction, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(sale, has quality bad)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(auction, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(competition, has quality good)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(auction, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(competition, has quality bad)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(auction, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(competition, be good for buisinesses)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(auction, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(gala, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(auction, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(ebay, has quality use)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(auction, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(exhibition, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(auction, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(sale, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(auction, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(competition, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(auction, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(sale, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(auction, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(competition, has quality bad)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(auction, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(competition, be in market good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(auction, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(competition, be good for buisinesses)