auction: is expensive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents sale
Weight: 0.68
, competition
Weight: 0.64
, event
Weight: 0.61
, publication
Weight: 0.56
Siblings ebay
Weight: 0.63
, gala
Weight: 0.33
, purchase
Weight: 0.32
, wedding reception
Weight: 0.32
, exhibition
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is expensive 1.00
is cheaper 0.85
be more expensive than retail 0.80
is cheap 0.79
is shipping expensive 0.78
be cheap 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(auction, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(wedding reception, is expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(auction, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(ebay, is cheaper)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(auction, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(ebay, be more expensive than retail)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(auction, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(wedding reception, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(wedding reception, is expensive)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(auction, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(ebay, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(ebay, is cheaper)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(auction, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(ebay, be more expensive than retail)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(ebay, be more expensive than retail)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(auction, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(auction, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(auction, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(auction, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(auction, is expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(auction, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(auction, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(auction, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(ebay, be more expensive than retail)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(auction, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(wedding reception, is expensive)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(auction, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(ebay, is cheaper)