auditor: consider internal controls of organization

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents position
Weight: 0.64
, expert
Weight: 0.59
, office
Weight: 0.57
, professional
Weight: 0.55
Siblings accountant
Weight: 0.33
, supervisor
Weight: 0.33
, appraiser
Weight: 0.33
, attorney
Weight: 0.33
, lawyer
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
consider internal controls of organization 1.00
consider internal controls 0.96
consider controls of organization 0.96
be concerned about internal controls 0.91
consider controls 0.89
rely on internal controls 0.89
assess internal controls 0.89
be concerned about controls 0.83
assess controls 0.81
rely on controls 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(auditor, consider internal controls of organization)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(auditor, consider internal controls of organization)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(auditor, consider internal controls of organization)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(auditor, rely on internal controls)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(auditor, consider internal controls of organization)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(auditor, consider internal controls)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(auditor, consider internal controls of organization)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(auditor, consider controls)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(auditor, consider internal controls of organization)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(auditor, consider controls of organization)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(auditor, consider internal controls of organization)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(auditor, consider internal controls)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(auditor, consider internal controls of organization)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(auditor, consider internal controls)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(auditor, consider internal controls of organization)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(auditor, be concerned about internal controls)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(auditor, consider internal controls of organization)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(auditor, consider controls of organization)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(auditor, consider internal controls of organization)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(auditor, consider internal controls)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(auditor, consider internal controls of organization)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(auditor, rely on controls)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(auditor, consider internal controls of organization)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(auditor, rely on internal controls)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(auditor, consider internal controls of organization)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(auditor, consider controls)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(auditor, consider internal controls of organization)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(auditor, rely on internal controls)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(auditor, consider internal controls of organization)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(auditor, assess internal controls)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(auditor, consider internal controls of organization)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(auditor, consider controls)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(auditor, consider internal controls of organization)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(auditor, rely on internal controls)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(auditor, consider internal controls of organization)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(auditor, consider controls)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(auditor, consider internal controls of organization)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(auditor, assess internal controls)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(auditor, consider internal controls of organization)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(auditor, be concerned about internal controls)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(auditor, consider internal controls of organization)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(auditor, be concerned about controls)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(auditor, consider internal controls of organization)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(auditor, consider controls of organization)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(auditor, consider internal controls of organization)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(auditor, consider controls of organization)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(auditor, consider internal controls of organization)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(auditor, rely on controls)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(auditor, consider internal controls of organization)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(auditor, rely on controls)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(auditor, consider internal controls of organization)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(auditor, assess internal controls)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(auditor, consider internal controls of organization)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(auditor, assess controls)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(auditor, consider internal controls of organization)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(auditor, assess controls)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(auditor, consider internal controls of organization)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(auditor, assess internal controls)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(auditor, consider internal controls of organization)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(auditor, assess controls)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(auditor, consider internal controls of organization)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(auditor, rely on controls)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(auditor, consider internal controls of organization)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(auditor, be concerned about controls)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(auditor, consider internal controls of organization)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(auditor, assess controls)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(auditor, consider internal controls of organization)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(auditor, be concerned about internal controls)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(auditor, consider internal controls of organization)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(auditor, be concerned about controls)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(auditor, consider internal controls of organization)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(auditor, be concerned about internal controls)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(auditor, consider internal controls of organization)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(auditor, be concerned about controls)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(auditor, consider internal controls of organization)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(auditor, consider internal controls of organization)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(auditor, consider internal controls of organization)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(auditor, consider internal controls of organization)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(auditor, consider internal controls of organization)