aussies: be with cats

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents food
Weight: 0.40
, guy
Weight: 0.40
, rider
Weight: 0.40
, dog
Weight: 0.36
, everyone
Weight: 0.33
Siblings chinese food
Weight: 0.29
, jackson
Weight: 0.29
, mexican food
Weight: 0.29
, justin
Weight: 0.29
, johnson
Weight: 0.29

Related properties

Property Similarity
be with cats 1.00
is dogs 0.88
is best dogs 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, is dogs)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(aussies, be with cats)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.00
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(aussies, be with cats)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(dog, is dogs)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.50
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(aussies, be with cats)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(dog, is dogs)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, is dogs)
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(aussies, be with cats)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(aussies, be with cats)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(aussies, be with cats)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(aussies, be with cats)

Similarity expansion

0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(aussies, be with cats)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(aussies, is best dogs)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(aussies, be with cats)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(aussies, is best dogs)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(aussies, be with cats)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(aussies, is best dogs)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(aussies, be with cats)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(aussies, is best dogs)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(aussies, be with cats)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(aussies, be with cats)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(aussies, be with cats)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(aussies, be with cats)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(aussies, be with cats)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(aussies, be with cats)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, is dogs)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(aussies, be with cats)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, is dogs)