austin: is great

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents guy
Weight: 0.63
, place
Weight: 0.59
, great
Weight: 0.58
, location
Weight: 0.58
Siblings san antonio
Weight: 0.62
, jackson
Weight: 0.35
, michael jordan
Weight: 0.35
, justin
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is great 1.00
is great city 0.87
be great place live 0.85
is awesome 0.83
has quality good 0.81
get first good stuff 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(guy, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(austin, is great)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(austin, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(guy, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(austin, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(guy, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(austin, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(justin, is awesome)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(austin, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(san antonio, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(austin, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(jackson, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(guy, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(austin, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(austin, is great)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(austin, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(justin, is awesome) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(justin, is awesome)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(austin, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(jackson, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(jackson, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(austin, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(san antonio, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(san antonio, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(austin, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(austin, is great)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(austin, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(austin, is great city)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(austin, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(austin, is great city)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(austin, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(austin, be great place live)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(austin, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(austin, be great place live)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(austin, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(austin, is awesome)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(austin, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(austin, is awesome)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(austin, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(austin, be great place live)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(austin, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(austin, is great city)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(austin, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(austin, is awesome)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(austin, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(austin, get first good stuff)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(austin, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(austin, get first good stuff)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(austin, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(austin, be great place live)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(austin, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(austin, get first good stuff)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(austin, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(austin, is great city)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(austin, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(austin, is awesome)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(austin, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(austin, get first good stuff)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(austin, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(austin, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(austin, is great)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(austin, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(austin, is great)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(austin, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(guy, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(austin, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(justin, is awesome)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(austin, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(jackson, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(austin, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(san antonio, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(austin, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(guy, has quality good)