auto: be allowed in mumbai

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents crime
Weight: 0.59
, industry
Weight: 0.59
, function
Weight: 0.58
, sector
Weight: 0.57
, service
Weight: 0.56
Siblings automobile industry
Weight: 0.38
, auto racing
Weight: 0.36
, automobile
Weight: 0.36
, banking industry
Weight: 0.34
, aviation
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be allowed in mumbai 1.00
be allowed in south mumbai 0.97
be in london 0.76
be high in london 0.75
be in up london 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(service, be in london)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(auto, be allowed in mumbai)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(crime, be in london)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(auto, be allowed in mumbai)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(crime, be high in london)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(auto, be allowed in mumbai)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(crime, be in up london)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(auto, be allowed in mumbai)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(auto, be allowed in mumbai)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(crime, be in up london)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(auto, be allowed in mumbai)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(crime, be high in london)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(auto, be allowed in mumbai)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(crime, be in london)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(auto, be allowed in mumbai)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(service, be in london)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(auto, be allowed in mumbai)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(crime, be in up london)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(auto, be allowed in mumbai)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(crime, be in london)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(auto, be allowed in mumbai)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(crime, be high in london)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(auto, be allowed in mumbai)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(service, be in london)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(service, be in london)
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(auto, be allowed in mumbai)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(auto, be allowed in mumbai)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(crime, be in london)
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(auto, be allowed in mumbai)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(auto, be allowed in mumbai)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(crime, be high in london)
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(auto, be allowed in mumbai)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(auto, be allowed in mumbai)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(crime, be in up london)
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(auto, be allowed in mumbai)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(auto, be allowed in mumbai)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(auto, be allowed in mumbai)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(auto, be allowed in mumbai)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(auto, be allowed in mumbai)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(auto, be allowed in south mumbai)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(auto, be allowed in mumbai)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(auto, be allowed in south mumbai)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(auto, be allowed in mumbai)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(auto, be allowed in south mumbai)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(auto, be allowed in mumbai)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(auto, be allowed in south mumbai)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(auto, be allowed in mumbai)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(auto, be allowed in mumbai)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(auto, be allowed in mumbai)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(auto, be allowed in mumbai)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(auto, be allowed in mumbai)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(auto, be allowed in mumbai)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(crime, be in up london)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(auto, be allowed in mumbai)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(crime, be high in london)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(auto, be allowed in mumbai)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(crime, be in london)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(auto, be allowed in mumbai)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(service, be in london)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(auto, be allowed in mumbai)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(crime, be in up london)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(auto, be allowed in mumbai)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(crime, be high in london)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(auto, be allowed in mumbai)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(crime, be in london)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(auto, be allowed in mumbai)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(service, be in london)