automatic transmission: be efficient fuel

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents feature
Weight: 0.63
, accessory
Weight: 0.61
, option
Weight: 0.60
, manual
Weight: 0.60
Siblings automatic
Weight: 0.33
, compression
Weight: 0.32
, wiper
Weight: 0.32
, electronic device
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be efficient fuel 1.00
be efficient more fuel 0.99
be more efficient fuel 0.99
be efficient less fuel 0.97
be less efficient fuel 0.97
is efficient 0.91
use fuel 0.90
use more fuel 0.90
is more efficient 0.89
consume more fuel 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(manual, be efficient fuel)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(automatic transmission, be efficient fuel)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(manual, be efficient more fuel)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(automatic transmission, be efficient fuel)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(manual, be more efficient fuel)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(automatic transmission, be efficient fuel)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(automatic transmission, be efficient fuel)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(manual, be efficient fuel)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(automatic transmission, be efficient fuel)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(manual, be more efficient fuel)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(automatic transmission, be efficient fuel)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(manual, be efficient more fuel)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(automatic transmission, be efficient fuel)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(manual, be more efficient fuel)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(automatic transmission, be efficient fuel)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(manual, be efficient more fuel)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(automatic transmission, be efficient fuel)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(manual, be efficient fuel)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(automatic transmission, be efficient fuel)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(automatic, be less efficient fuel)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(automatic transmission, be efficient fuel)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(compression, is more efficient)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(automatic transmission, be efficient fuel)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(automatic, use more fuel)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(automatic transmission, be efficient fuel)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(automatic, use fuel)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(manual, be efficient fuel)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(automatic transmission, be efficient fuel)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(automatic transmission, be efficient fuel)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(manual, be efficient more fuel)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(automatic transmission, be efficient fuel)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(automatic transmission, be efficient fuel)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(manual, be more efficient fuel)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(automatic transmission, be efficient fuel)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(automatic transmission, be efficient fuel)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(automatic transmission, be efficient fuel)
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(automatic, be less efficient fuel)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(automatic, be less efficient fuel)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(automatic transmission, be efficient fuel)
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(automatic, use fuel)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(automatic, use fuel)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(automatic transmission, be efficient fuel)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(automatic, use more fuel)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(automatic, use more fuel)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(automatic transmission, be efficient fuel)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(compression, is more efficient)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(compression, is more efficient)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(automatic transmission, be efficient fuel)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(automatic transmission, be efficient fuel)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(automatic transmission, be efficient fuel)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(automatic transmission, be efficient less fuel)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(automatic transmission, be efficient fuel)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(automatic transmission, be efficient less fuel)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(automatic transmission, be efficient fuel)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(automatic transmission, consume more fuel)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(automatic transmission, be efficient fuel)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(automatic transmission, be efficient less fuel)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(automatic transmission, be efficient fuel)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(automatic transmission, be efficient less fuel)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(automatic transmission, be efficient fuel)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(automatic transmission, consume more fuel)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(automatic transmission, be efficient fuel)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(automatic transmission, consume more fuel)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(automatic transmission, be efficient fuel)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(automatic transmission, consume more fuel)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(automatic transmission, be efficient fuel)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(automatic transmission, be efficient fuel)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(automatic transmission, be efficient fuel)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(automatic transmission, be efficient fuel)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(automatic transmission, be efficient fuel)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(automatic transmission, be efficient fuel)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(manual, be efficient fuel)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(automatic transmission, be efficient fuel)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(manual, be more efficient fuel)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(automatic transmission, be efficient fuel)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(manual, be efficient more fuel)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(automatic transmission, be efficient fuel)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(automatic, use fuel)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(automatic transmission, be efficient fuel)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(automatic, use more fuel)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(automatic transmission, be efficient fuel)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(automatic, be less efficient fuel)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(automatic transmission, be efficient fuel)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(compression, is more efficient)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(automatic transmission, be efficient fuel)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(manual, be efficient fuel)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(automatic transmission, be efficient fuel)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(manual, be more efficient fuel)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(automatic transmission, be efficient fuel)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(manual, be efficient more fuel)