automatic transmission: is expensive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents feature
Weight: 0.63
, accessory
Weight: 0.61
, option
Weight: 0.60
, manual
Weight: 0.60
Siblings automatic
Weight: 0.33
, compression
Weight: 0.32
, wiper
Weight: 0.32
, electronic device
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is expensive 1.00
is expensive bondarenko 1.00
is more expensive 0.94
is expensive now 0.94
is change expensive 0.88
is expensive right now 0.86
is cheaper 0.85
be on cars expensive 0.84
be more expensive to tax 0.81
be more expensive than manual 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(option, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(automatic transmission, is expensive)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(accessory, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(automatic transmission, is expensive)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(option, is expensive now)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(automatic transmission, is expensive)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(option, is expensive right now)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(automatic transmission, is expensive)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(option, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(automatic transmission, is expensive)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(option, is expensive bondarenko)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(automatic transmission, is expensive)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(automatic transmission, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(option, is expensive bondarenko)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(automatic transmission, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(accessory, is expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(automatic transmission, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(option, is expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(automatic transmission, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(option, is expensive now)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(automatic transmission, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(option, is expensive right now)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(automatic transmission, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(option, is cheaper)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.49
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(automatic transmission, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(option, is expensive bondarenko)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(automatic transmission, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(accessory, is expensive)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(automatic transmission, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(option, is expensive)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(automatic transmission, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(option, is expensive now)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(automatic transmission, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(option, is cheaper)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(automatic transmission, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(option, is expensive right now)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(automatic transmission, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(automatic, be more expensive to tax)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(automatic transmission, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(automatic, is more expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(automatic transmission, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(automatic, is expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(automatic transmission, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(automatic, is cheaper)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(automatic transmission, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(automatic, be more expensive than manual)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(option, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(automatic transmission, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(automatic transmission, is expensive)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(accessory, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(automatic transmission, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(automatic transmission, is expensive)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(option, is expensive now)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(automatic transmission, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(automatic transmission, is expensive)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(option, is expensive right now)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(automatic transmission, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(automatic transmission, is expensive)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(option, is expensive bondarenko)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(automatic transmission, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(automatic transmission, is expensive)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(option, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(automatic transmission, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(automatic transmission, is expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(automatic transmission, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(automatic, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(automatic, is expensive)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(automatic transmission, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(automatic, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(automatic, is more expensive)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(automatic transmission, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(automatic, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(automatic, is cheaper)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(automatic transmission, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(automatic, be more expensive to tax)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(automatic, be more expensive to tax)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(automatic transmission, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(automatic, be more expensive than manual)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(automatic, be more expensive than manual)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(automatic transmission, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(automatic transmission, is expensive)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(automatic transmission, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(automatic transmission, is more expensive)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(automatic transmission, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(automatic transmission, is more expensive)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(automatic transmission, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(automatic transmission, is more expensive)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(automatic transmission, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(automatic transmission, is more expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(automatic transmission, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(automatic transmission, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(automatic transmission, is expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(automatic transmission, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(automatic transmission, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(automatic transmission, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(option, is expensive bondarenko)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(automatic transmission, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(option, is expensive now)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(automatic transmission, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(accessory, is expensive)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(automatic transmission, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(option, is expensive)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(automatic transmission, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(option, is expensive right now)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(automatic transmission, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(option, is cheaper)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(automatic transmission, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(automatic, be more expensive to tax)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(automatic transmission, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(automatic, is more expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(automatic transmission, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(automatic, be more expensive than manual)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(automatic transmission, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(automatic, is expensive)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(automatic transmission, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(automatic, is cheaper)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(automatic transmission, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(option, is expensive bondarenko)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(automatic transmission, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(accessory, is expensive)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(automatic transmission, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(option, is expensive)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(automatic transmission, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(option, is expensive now)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(automatic transmission, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(option, is expensive right now)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(automatic transmission, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(option, is cheaper)