automatic transmission: is more expensive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents feature
Weight: 0.63
, accessory
Weight: 0.61
, option
Weight: 0.60
, manual
Weight: 0.60
Siblings automatic
Weight: 0.33
, compression
Weight: 0.32
, wiper
Weight: 0.32
, electronic device
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is more expensive 1.00
is expensive 0.94
is expensive bondarenko 0.94
is expensive now 0.92
be more expensive than manual 0.86
is cheaper 0.86
is change expensive 0.86
be more expensive to tax 0.84
is expensive right now 0.84
is more efficient 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(option, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(automatic transmission, is more expensive)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(accessory, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(automatic transmission, is more expensive)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(option, is expensive now) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(automatic transmission, is more expensive)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(option, is cheaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(automatic transmission, is more expensive)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(option, is expensive right now) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(automatic transmission, is more expensive)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(option, is expensive bondarenko) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(automatic transmission, is more expensive)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(automatic transmission, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(option, is expensive bondarenko)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(automatic transmission, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(accessory, is expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(automatic transmission, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(option, is expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(automatic transmission, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(option, is expensive now)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(automatic transmission, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(option, is cheaper)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(automatic transmission, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(option, is expensive right now)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(automatic transmission, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(option, is expensive bondarenko)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(automatic transmission, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(accessory, is expensive)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(automatic transmission, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(option, is expensive)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(automatic transmission, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(option, is expensive now)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(automatic transmission, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(option, is cheaper)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(automatic transmission, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(option, is expensive right now)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(automatic transmission, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(automatic, is more expensive)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(automatic transmission, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(automatic, be more expensive to tax)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(automatic transmission, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(automatic, is expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(automatic transmission, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(automatic, be more expensive than manual)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(automatic transmission, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(automatic, is cheaper)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(automatic transmission, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(compression, is more efficient)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(option, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(automatic transmission, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(automatic transmission, is more expensive)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(accessory, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(automatic transmission, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(automatic transmission, is more expensive)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(option, is expensive now) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(automatic transmission, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(automatic transmission, is more expensive)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(option, is cheaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(automatic transmission, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(automatic transmission, is more expensive)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(option, is expensive right now) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(automatic transmission, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(automatic transmission, is more expensive)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(option, is expensive bondarenko) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(automatic transmission, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(automatic transmission, is more expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(automatic transmission, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(automatic, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(automatic, is more expensive)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(automatic transmission, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(automatic, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(automatic, is expensive)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(automatic transmission, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(automatic, be more expensive to tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(automatic, be more expensive to tax)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(automatic transmission, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(automatic, be more expensive than manual) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(automatic, be more expensive than manual)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(automatic transmission, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(automatic, is cheaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(automatic, is cheaper)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(automatic transmission, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(compression, is more efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(compression, is more efficient)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(automatic transmission, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(automatic transmission, is more expensive)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(automatic transmission, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(automatic transmission, is expensive)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(automatic transmission, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(automatic transmission, is expensive)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(automatic transmission, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(automatic transmission, is expensive)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(automatic transmission, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(automatic transmission, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(automatic transmission, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(automatic transmission, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(automatic transmission, is more expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(automatic transmission, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(automatic transmission, is more expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(automatic transmission, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(option, is expensive bondarenko)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(automatic transmission, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(option, is expensive now)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(automatic transmission, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(accessory, is expensive)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(automatic transmission, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(option, is expensive)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(automatic transmission, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(option, is cheaper)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(automatic transmission, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(option, is expensive right now)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(automatic transmission, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(automatic, be more expensive to tax)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(automatic transmission, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(automatic, is more expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(automatic transmission, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(automatic, be more expensive than manual)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(automatic transmission, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(automatic, is expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(automatic transmission, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(automatic, is cheaper)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(automatic transmission, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(compression, is more efficient)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(automatic transmission, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(option, is expensive bondarenko)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(automatic transmission, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(accessory, is expensive)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(automatic transmission, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(option, is expensive)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(automatic transmission, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(option, is expensive now)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(automatic transmission, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(option, is cheaper)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(automatic transmission, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(option, is expensive right now)