automatic: be better than manual

Property	Similarity
be better than manual	1.00
be faster than manual	0.96
be more expensive than manual	0.95
be less efficient than manual	0.93
be better than manuals	0.88
be faster than manuals	0.87
be much slower than manuals	0.87
be more expensive than manuals	0.86
cost more than manuals	0.86
use more fuel than manuals	0.84

0.76

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.86

Remarkable(automatic, be better than manual) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Remarkable(automatic, be more expensive than manual)

0.75

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.86

Remarkable(automatic, be better than manual) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Remarkable(automatic, be faster than manual)

0.73

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.86

Remarkable(automatic, be better than manual) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Remarkable(automatic, be less efficient than manual)

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.86

Remarkable(automatic, be better than manual) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Remarkable(automatic, be much slower than manuals)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.86

Remarkable(automatic, be better than manual) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Remarkable(automatic, be more expensive than manuals)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.86

Remarkable(automatic, be better than manual) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Remarkable(automatic, be faster than manuals)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.73

Salient(automatic, be better than manual) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Salient(automatic, be less efficient than manual)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.73

Salient(automatic, be better than manual) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Salient(automatic, be more expensive than manual)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.86

Remarkable(automatic, be better than manual) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(automatic, be better than manuals)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.73

Salient(automatic, be better than manual) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Salient(automatic, be faster than manual)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.86

Remarkable(automatic, be better than manual) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(automatic, cost more than manuals)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.73

Salient(automatic, be better than manual) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Salient(automatic, be much slower than manuals)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.86

Remarkable(automatic, be better than manual) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(automatic, use more fuel than manuals)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.53

Plausible(automatic, be better than manual) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Plausible(automatic, be less efficient than manual)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.73

Salient(automatic, be better than manual) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Salient(automatic, be more expensive than manuals)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.73

Salient(automatic, be better than manual) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Salient(automatic, be faster than manuals)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.73

Salient(automatic, be better than manual) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Salient(automatic, be better than manuals)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.53

Plausible(automatic, be better than manual) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Plausible(automatic, be more expensive than manual)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.73

Salient(automatic, be better than manual) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Salient(automatic, cost more than manuals)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.73

Salient(automatic, be better than manual) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Salient(automatic, use more fuel than manuals)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.53

Plausible(automatic, be better than manual) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Plausible(automatic, be faster than manual)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.41

Typical(automatic, be better than manual) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Typical(automatic, be less efficient than manual)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.53

Plausible(automatic, be better than manual) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Plausible(automatic, be much slower than manuals)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.53

Plausible(automatic, be better than manual) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Plausible(automatic, use more fuel than manuals)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.41

Typical(automatic, be better than manual) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Typical(automatic, use more fuel than manuals)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.53

Plausible(automatic, be better than manual) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Plausible(automatic, be more expensive than manuals)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.53

Plausible(automatic, be better than manual) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Plausible(automatic, cost more than manuals)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.41

Typical(automatic, be better than manual) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Typical(automatic, be faster than manual)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.53

Plausible(automatic, be better than manual) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Plausible(automatic, be faster than manuals)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.41

Typical(automatic, be better than manual) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Typical(automatic, be better than manuals)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.41

Typical(automatic, be better than manual) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Typical(automatic, be more expensive than manual)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.41

Typical(automatic, be better than manual) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Typical(automatic, cost more than manuals)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.41

Typical(automatic, be better than manual) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Typical(automatic, be much slower than manuals)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.53

Plausible(automatic, be better than manual) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Plausible(automatic, be better than manuals)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.41

Typical(automatic, be better than manual) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Typical(automatic, be faster than manuals)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.41

Typical(automatic, be better than manual) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(automatic, be more expensive than manuals)

Parents	application Weight: 0.54 , thing Weight: 0.49 , option Weight: 0.47 , club Weight: 0.47 , system Weight: 0.45
Siblings	automatic transmission Weight: 0.33 , time machine Weight: 0.31 , attachment Weight: 0.30 , defense system Weight: 0.30

automatic: be better than manual

Related concepts

Related properties

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

Salient implies Plausible

Similarity expansion

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

Typical implies Plausible

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings