automatic: be more expensive to tax

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents application
Weight: 0.54
, thing
Weight: 0.49
, option
Weight: 0.47
, club
Weight: 0.47
, system
Weight: 0.45
Siblings automatic transmission
Weight: 0.33
, time machine
Weight: 0.31
, attachment
Weight: 0.30
, defense system
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more expensive to tax 1.00
is more expensive 0.84
is expensive 0.81
is cheaper 0.76
be more expensive than manual 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(thing, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(automatic, be more expensive to tax)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(option, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(automatic, be more expensive to tax)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(application, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(automatic, be more expensive to tax)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(option, is cheaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(automatic, be more expensive to tax)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(automatic, be more expensive to tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(application, is expensive)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(automatic, be more expensive to tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(option, is cheaper)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(automatic, be more expensive to tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(option, is expensive)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(automatic, be more expensive to tax) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(thing, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(automatic, be more expensive to tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(application, is expensive)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(automatic, be more expensive to tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(option, is expensive)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(automatic, be more expensive to tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(thing, is expensive)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(automatic, be more expensive to tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(option, is cheaper)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(automatic, be more expensive to tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(automatic transmission, is more expensive)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(automatic, be more expensive to tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(automatic transmission, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(thing, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(automatic, be more expensive to tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(automatic, be more expensive to tax)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(option, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(automatic, be more expensive to tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(automatic, be more expensive to tax)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(application, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(automatic, be more expensive to tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(automatic, be more expensive to tax)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(option, is cheaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(automatic, be more expensive to tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(automatic, be more expensive to tax)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(automatic, be more expensive to tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(automatic transmission, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(automatic transmission, is expensive)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(automatic, be more expensive to tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(automatic transmission, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(automatic transmission, is more expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(automatic, be more expensive to tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(automatic, be more expensive to tax)

Similarity expansion

0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(automatic, be more expensive to tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(automatic, is more expensive)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(automatic, be more expensive to tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(automatic, is cheaper)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(automatic, be more expensive to tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(automatic, be more expensive than manual)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(automatic, be more expensive to tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(automatic, be more expensive than manual)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(automatic, be more expensive to tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(automatic, is more expensive)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(automatic, be more expensive to tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(automatic, is expensive)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(automatic, be more expensive to tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(automatic, is expensive)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(automatic, be more expensive to tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(automatic, is cheaper)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(automatic, be more expensive to tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(automatic, be more expensive than manual)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(automatic, be more expensive to tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(automatic, be more expensive than manual)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(automatic, be more expensive to tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(automatic, is more expensive)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(automatic, be more expensive to tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(automatic, is more expensive)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(automatic, be more expensive to tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(automatic, is cheaper)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(automatic, be more expensive to tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(automatic, is cheaper)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(automatic, be more expensive to tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(automatic, is expensive)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(automatic, be more expensive to tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(automatic, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(automatic, be more expensive to tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(automatic, be more expensive to tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(automatic, be more expensive to tax)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(automatic, be more expensive to tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(automatic, be more expensive to tax)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(automatic, be more expensive to tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(application, is expensive)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(automatic, be more expensive to tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(option, is expensive)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(automatic, be more expensive to tax) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(thing, is expensive)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(automatic, be more expensive to tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(option, is cheaper)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(automatic, be more expensive to tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(automatic transmission, is more expensive)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(automatic, be more expensive to tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(automatic transmission, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(automatic, be more expensive to tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(application, is expensive)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(automatic, be more expensive to tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(option, is expensive)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(automatic, be more expensive to tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(option, is cheaper)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(automatic, be more expensive to tax) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(thing, is expensive)