automatic: is expensive

Related concepts

Parents	application Weight: 0.54 , thing Weight: 0.49 , option Weight: 0.47 , club Weight: 0.47 , system Weight: 0.45
Siblings	automatic transmission Weight: 0.33 , time machine Weight: 0.31 , attachment Weight: 0.30 , defense system Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property	Similarity
is expensive	1.00
is more expensive	0.94
is cheaper	0.85
be more expensive to tax	0.81
be more expensive than manual	0.80
be more expensive than manuals	0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.66

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 1.00

Plausible(thing, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Typical(automatic, is expensive)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.88

Plausible(option, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Typical(automatic, is expensive)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.86

Plausible(application, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Typical(automatic, is expensive)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.86

Plausible(option, is cheaper) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Typical(automatic, is expensive)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.88

Plausible(automatic, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Plausible(application, is expensive)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.88

Plausible(automatic, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Plausible(option, is expensive)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.88

Plausible(automatic, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 1.00

¬ Plausible(thing, is expensive)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.88

Plausible(automatic, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Plausible(option, is cheaper)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Remarkable(automatic, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Remarkable(application, is expensive)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Remarkable(automatic, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(option, is expensive)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Remarkable(automatic, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(option, is cheaper)

0.25

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Remarkable(automatic, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Remarkable(thing, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Remarkable(automatic, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Remarkable(automatic transmission, is expensive)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Remarkable(automatic, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Remarkable(automatic transmission, is more expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 1.00

Plausible(thing, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

Remarkable(automatic, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Plausible(automatic, is expensive)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.88

Plausible(option, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

Remarkable(automatic, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Plausible(automatic, is expensive)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.86

Plausible(application, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

Remarkable(automatic, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Plausible(automatic, is expensive)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.86

Plausible(option, is cheaper) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

Remarkable(automatic, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Plausible(automatic, is expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.88

Plausible(automatic, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

Remarkable(automatic transmission, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Plausible(automatic transmission, is expensive)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.88

Plausible(automatic, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

Remarkable(automatic transmission, is more expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Plausible(automatic transmission, is more expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.88

Plausible(automatic, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Salient(automatic, is expensive)

Similarity expansion

0.77

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.94

Salient(automatic, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Salient(automatic, is more expensive)

0.76

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.94

Typical(automatic, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Typical(automatic, is more expensive)

0.74

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.88

Plausible(automatic, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Plausible(automatic, is more expensive)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.94

Salient(automatic, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Salient(automatic, is cheaper)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.94

Typical(automatic, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Typical(automatic, is cheaper)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.94

Salient(automatic, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Salient(automatic, be more expensive to tax)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.88

Plausible(automatic, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Plausible(automatic, be more expensive to tax)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.94

Typical(automatic, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Typical(automatic, be more expensive to tax)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.58

Remarkable(automatic, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Remarkable(automatic, is more expensive)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.88

Plausible(automatic, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Plausible(automatic, is cheaper)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.94

Salient(automatic, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Salient(automatic, be more expensive than manual)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.58

Remarkable(automatic, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Remarkable(automatic, be more expensive to tax)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.94

Typical(automatic, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Typical(automatic, be more expensive than manual)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.88

Plausible(automatic, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Plausible(automatic, be more expensive than manual)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.94

Salient(automatic, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Salient(automatic, be more expensive than manuals)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.94

Typical(automatic, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(automatic, be more expensive than manuals)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.88

Plausible(automatic, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Plausible(automatic, be more expensive than manuals)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.58

Remarkable(automatic, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Remarkable(automatic, is cheaper)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.58

Remarkable(automatic, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Remarkable(automatic, be more expensive than manual)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.58

Remarkable(automatic, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Remarkable(automatic, be more expensive than manuals)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.94

Salient(automatic, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Typical(automatic, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Remarkable(automatic, is expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.88

Plausible(automatic, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Typical(automatic, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Remarkable(automatic, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Typical(application, is expensive)

0.23

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Remarkable(automatic, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Typical(option, is expensive)

0.22

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Remarkable(automatic, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 1.00

¬ Typical(thing, is expensive)

0.20

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Remarkable(automatic, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Typical(option, is cheaper)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Remarkable(automatic, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Typical(automatic transmission, is expensive)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Remarkable(automatic, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Typical(automatic transmission, is more expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.94

Typical(automatic, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Typical(application, is expensive)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.94

Typical(automatic, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Typical(option, is expensive)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.94

Typical(automatic, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 1.00

¬ Typical(thing, is expensive)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.94

Typical(automatic, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Typical(option, is cheaper)