automatic: is more expensive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents application
Weight: 0.54
, thing
Weight: 0.49
, option
Weight: 0.47
, club
Weight: 0.47
, system
Weight: 0.45
Siblings automatic transmission
Weight: 0.33
, time machine
Weight: 0.31
, attachment
Weight: 0.30
, defense system
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
is more expensive 1.00
is expensive 0.94
be more expensive than manual 0.86
is cheaper 0.86
be more expensive to tax 0.84
be less efficient than manual 0.82
be more expensive than manuals 0.81
be less efficient fuel 0.79
cost more than manuals 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.63
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(thing, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(automatic, is more expensive)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(option, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(automatic, is more expensive)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(application, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(automatic, is more expensive)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(option, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(automatic, is more expensive)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(automatic, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(application, is expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(automatic, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(option, is expensive)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(automatic, is more expensive)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(thing, is expensive)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(automatic, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(option, is cheaper)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(automatic, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(application, is expensive)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(automatic, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(option, is expensive)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(automatic, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(option, is cheaper)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(automatic, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(thing, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(automatic, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(automatic transmission, is more expensive)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(automatic, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(automatic transmission, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(thing, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(automatic, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(automatic, is more expensive)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(option, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(automatic, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(automatic, is more expensive)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(application, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(automatic, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(automatic, is more expensive)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(option, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(automatic, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(automatic, is more expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(automatic, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(automatic transmission, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(automatic transmission, is more expensive)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(automatic, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(automatic transmission, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(automatic transmission, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(automatic, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(automatic, is more expensive)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(automatic, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(automatic, is expensive)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(automatic, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(automatic, be more expensive to tax)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(automatic, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(automatic, be more expensive to tax)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(automatic, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(automatic, be more expensive to tax)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(automatic, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(automatic, be more expensive to tax)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(automatic, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(automatic, be more expensive than manual)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(automatic, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(automatic, be less efficient than manual)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(automatic, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(automatic, is cheaper)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(automatic, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(automatic, be less efficient fuel)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(automatic, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(automatic, be more expensive than manuals)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(automatic, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(automatic, be more expensive than manual)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(automatic, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(automatic, is expensive)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(automatic, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(automatic, be less efficient than manual)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(automatic, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(automatic, be more expensive than manual)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(automatic, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(automatic, be less efficient fuel)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(automatic, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(automatic, cost more than manuals)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(automatic, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(automatic, be less efficient fuel)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(automatic, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(automatic, is expensive)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(automatic, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(automatic, be less efficient than manual)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(automatic, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(automatic, is cheaper)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(automatic, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(automatic, be more expensive than manuals)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(automatic, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(automatic, is cheaper)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(automatic, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(automatic, be more expensive than manuals)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(automatic, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(automatic, be more expensive than manual)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(automatic, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(automatic, is cheaper)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(automatic, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(automatic, cost more than manuals)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(automatic, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(automatic, be less efficient fuel)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(automatic, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(automatic, is expensive)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(automatic, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(automatic, be more expensive than manuals)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(automatic, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(automatic, cost more than manuals)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(automatic, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(automatic, be less efficient than manual)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(automatic, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(automatic, cost more than manuals)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(automatic, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(automatic, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(automatic, is more expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(automatic, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(automatic, is more expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(automatic, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(application, is expensive)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(automatic, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(option, is expensive)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(automatic, is more expensive)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(thing, is expensive)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(automatic, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(option, is cheaper)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(automatic, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(automatic transmission, is more expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(automatic, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(automatic transmission, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(automatic, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(application, is expensive)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(automatic, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(option, is expensive)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(automatic, is more expensive)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(thing, is expensive)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(automatic, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(option, is cheaper)