avenue: be used to have name

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents opportunity
Weight: 0.64
, street
Weight: 0.62
, thing
Weight: 0.57
, term
Weight: 0.53
, time
Weight: 0.52
Siblings street sign
Weight: 0.34
, alley
Weight: 0.33
, pathway
Weight: 0.32
, boulevard
Weight: 0.32
, way
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used to have name 1.00
has name 0.96
be defined as name for group of clown 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(street, has name)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(avenue, be used to have name)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(avenue, be used to have name)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(street, has name)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(avenue, be used to have name)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(street, has name)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(avenue, be used to have name)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(alley, be defined as name for group of clown)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(street, has name)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(avenue, be used to have name)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(avenue, be used to have name)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(avenue, be used to have name)
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(alley, be defined as name for group of clown)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(alley, be defined as name for group of clown)

Salient implies Plausible

0.11
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(avenue, be used to have name)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(avenue, be used to have name)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(avenue, be used to have name)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(avenue, be used to have name)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(avenue, be used to have name)

Typical implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(avenue, be used to have name)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(avenue, be used to have name)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(avenue, be used to have name)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(street, has name)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(avenue, be used to have name)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(alley, be defined as name for group of clown)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(avenue, be used to have name)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(street, has name)