average: has quality function

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents batting average
Weight: 0.74
, indicator
Weight: 0.68
, characteristic
Weight: 0.59
, year
Weight: 0.58
Siblings arithmetic mean
Weight: 0.59
, geometric mean
Weight: 0.53
, chart
Weight: 0.33
, volume
Weight: 0.33
, fiscal year
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality function 1.00
is state function 0.89
be function of temperature 0.83
has quality better 0.78
has quality good 0.78
has quality bad 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(batting average, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(average, has quality function)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(characteristic, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(average, has quality function)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(average, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(characteristic, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(average, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(batting average, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(average, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(batting average, has quality bad)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(average, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(characteristic, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(average, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(geometric mean, has quality better)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(average, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(fiscal year, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(batting average, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(average, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(average, has quality function)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(characteristic, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(average, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(average, has quality function)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(average, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(fiscal year, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(fiscal year, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(average, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(geometric mean, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(geometric mean, has quality better)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(average, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(average, has quality function)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(average, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(average, has quality bad)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(average, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(average, has quality bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(average, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(average, has quality bad)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(average, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(average, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(average, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(average, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(average, has quality function)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(average, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(average, has quality function)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(average, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(characteristic, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(average, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(batting average, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(average, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(fiscal year, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(average, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(geometric mean, has quality better)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(average, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(characteristic, has quality good)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(average, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(batting average, has quality bad)