aviation: is expensive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents industry
Weight: 0.70
, sector
Weight: 0.68
, activity
Weight: 0.59
, matter
Weight: 0.58
Siblings automobile industry
Weight: 0.38
, banking industry
Weight: 0.36
, airline
Weight: 0.36
, public transport
Weight: 0.34
, automobile
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is expensive 1.00
is attractive 0.76
become less popular 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(aviation, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(public transport, is expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(aviation, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(automobile, is expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(aviation, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(automobile, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(automobile, is expensive)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(aviation, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(public transport, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(public transport, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(aviation, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(aviation, is expensive)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(aviation, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(aviation, become less popular)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(aviation, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(aviation, become less popular)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(aviation, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(aviation, become less popular)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(aviation, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(aviation, is attractive)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(aviation, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(aviation, is attractive)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(aviation, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(aviation, become less popular)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(aviation, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(aviation, is attractive)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(aviation, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(aviation, is attractive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(aviation, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(aviation, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(aviation, is expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(aviation, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(aviation, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(aviation, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(automobile, is expensive)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(aviation, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(public transport, is expensive)