award: be for best screenwriting

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents prize
Weight: 0.70
, recognition
Weight: 0.67
, honor
Weight: 0.60
, accolade
Weight: 0.48
Siblings trophy
Weight: 0.69
, medal
Weight: 0.68
, scholarship
Weight: 0.63
, badge
Weight: 0.60
, best
Weight: 0.60

Related properties

Property Similarity
be for best screenwriting 1.00
be for screenwriting 0.98
be for best screenwriting judged 0.94
be for screenwriting judged 0.93

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(award, be for best screenwriting)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(award, be for best screenwriting)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(award, be for best screenwriting)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(award, be for screenwriting)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(award, be for best screenwriting)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(award, be for screenwriting)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(award, be for best screenwriting)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(award, be for screenwriting)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(award, be for best screenwriting)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(award, be for screenwriting judged)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(award, be for best screenwriting)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(award, be for screenwriting judged)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(award, be for best screenwriting)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(award, be for screenwriting judged)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(award, be for best screenwriting)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(award, be for best screenwriting judged)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(award, be for best screenwriting)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(award, be for best screenwriting judged)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(award, be for best screenwriting)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(award, be for screenwriting judged)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(award, be for best screenwriting)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(award, be for best screenwriting judged)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(award, be for best screenwriting)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(award, be for best screenwriting judged)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(award, be for best screenwriting)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(award, be for screenwriting)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(award, be for best screenwriting)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(award, be for best screenwriting)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(award, be for best screenwriting)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(award, be for best screenwriting)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(award, be for best screenwriting)