award: be for screenwriting

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents prize
Weight: 0.70
, recognition
Weight: 0.67
, honor
Weight: 0.60
, accolade
Weight: 0.48
Siblings trophy
Weight: 0.69
, medal
Weight: 0.68
, scholarship
Weight: 0.63
, badge
Weight: 0.60
, best
Weight: 0.60

Related properties

Property Similarity
be for screenwriting 1.00
be for best screenwriting 0.98
be for screenwriting judged 0.93
be for best screenwriting judged 0.92

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(award, be for screenwriting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(award, be for screenwriting)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(award, be for screenwriting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(award, be for screenwriting judged)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(award, be for screenwriting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(award, be for screenwriting judged)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(award, be for screenwriting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(award, be for best screenwriting)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(award, be for screenwriting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(award, be for best screenwriting judged)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(award, be for screenwriting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(award, be for screenwriting judged)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(award, be for screenwriting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(award, be for screenwriting judged)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(award, be for screenwriting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(award, be for best screenwriting)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(award, be for screenwriting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(award, be for best screenwriting)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(award, be for screenwriting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(award, be for best screenwriting)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(award, be for screenwriting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(award, be for best screenwriting judged)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(award, be for screenwriting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(award, be for best screenwriting judged)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(award, be for screenwriting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(award, be for best screenwriting judged)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(award, be for screenwriting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(award, be for screenwriting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(award, be for screenwriting)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(award, be for screenwriting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(award, be for screenwriting)