award: be for screenwriting judged

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents prize
Weight: 0.70
, recognition
Weight: 0.67
, honor
Weight: 0.60
, accolade
Weight: 0.48
Siblings trophy
Weight: 0.69
, medal
Weight: 0.68
, scholarship
Weight: 0.63
, badge
Weight: 0.60
, best
Weight: 0.60

Related properties

Property Similarity
be for screenwriting judged 1.00
be for best screenwriting judged 0.99
be for screenwriting 0.93
be for best screenwriting 0.93

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(award, be for screenwriting judged)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(award, be for screenwriting judged)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(award, be for screenwriting judged)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(award, be for screenwriting)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(award, be for screenwriting judged)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(award, be for screenwriting)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(award, be for screenwriting judged)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(award, be for screenwriting)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(award, be for screenwriting judged)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(award, be for best screenwriting judged)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(award, be for screenwriting judged)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(award, be for screenwriting)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(award, be for screenwriting judged)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(award, be for best screenwriting)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(award, be for screenwriting judged)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(award, be for best screenwriting judged)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(award, be for screenwriting judged)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(award, be for best screenwriting)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(award, be for screenwriting judged)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(award, be for best screenwriting judged)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(award, be for screenwriting judged)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(award, be for best screenwriting)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(award, be for screenwriting judged)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(award, be for best screenwriting judged)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(award, be for screenwriting judged)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(award, be for best screenwriting)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(award, be for screenwriting judged)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(award, be for screenwriting judged)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(award, be for screenwriting judged)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(award, be for screenwriting judged)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(award, be for screenwriting judged)