award: be good for business

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents prize
Weight: 0.70
, recognition
Weight: 0.67
, honor
Weight: 0.60
, accolade
Weight: 0.48
Siblings trophy
Weight: 0.69
, medal
Weight: 0.68
, scholarship
Weight: 0.63
, badge
Weight: 0.60
, best
Weight: 0.60

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good for business 1.00
is very good 0.80
has quality good 0.80
be bad for environment 0.79
has quality bad 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(recognition, is very good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(award, be good for business)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(recognition, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(award, be good for business)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(recognition, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(award, be good for business)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(award, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(recognition, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(award, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(recognition, is very good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(award, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(recognition, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(award, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(recognition, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(award, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(recognition, is very good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(award, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(recognition, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(award, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(trophy, be bad for environment)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(award, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(trophy, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(award, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(scholarship, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(recognition, is very good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(award, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(award, be good for business)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(recognition, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(award, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(award, be good for business)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(recognition, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(award, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(award, be good for business)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(award, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(trophy, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(trophy, be bad for environment)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(award, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(scholarship, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(scholarship, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(award, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(trophy, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(trophy, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(award, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(award, be good for business)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(award, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(award, has quality bad)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(award, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(award, has quality bad)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(award, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(award, has quality bad)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(award, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(award, has quality bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(award, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(award, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(award, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(award, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(award, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(award, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(award, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(award, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(award, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(award, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(award, be good for business)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(award, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(award, be good for business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(award, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(recognition, has quality bad)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(award, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(recognition, has quality good)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(award, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(recognition, is very good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(award, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(trophy, be bad for environment)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(award, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(trophy, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(award, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(scholarship, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(award, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(recognition, has quality bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(award, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(recognition, has quality good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(award, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(recognition, is very good)