award: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents prize
Weight: 0.70
, recognition
Weight: 0.67
, honor
Weight: 0.60
, accolade
Weight: 0.48
Siblings trophy
Weight: 0.69
, medal
Weight: 0.68
, scholarship
Weight: 0.63
, badge
Weight: 0.60
, best
Weight: 0.60

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
has quality help 0.86
has quality start 0.83
has quality worth 0.82
be bad for environment 0.80
be good for business 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(recognition, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(award, has quality bad)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(recognition, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(award, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(award, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(recognition, has quality bad)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(award, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(recognition, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.57
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(award, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(recognition, has quality bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(award, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(recognition, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(award, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(trophy, has quality bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(award, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(scholarship, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(award, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(best, has quality help)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(award, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(trophy, be bad for environment)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(award, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(best, has quality start)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(award, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(best, has quality worth)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(recognition, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(award, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(award, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(recognition, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(award, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(award, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(award, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(trophy, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(trophy, has quality bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(award, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(scholarship, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(scholarship, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(award, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(best, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(best, has quality worth)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(award, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(trophy, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(trophy, be bad for environment)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(award, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(best, has quality start)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(best, has quality start)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(award, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(best, has quality help)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(best, has quality help)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(award, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(award, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(award, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(award, be good for business)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(award, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(award, has quality good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(award, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(award, be good for business)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(award, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(award, be good for business)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(award, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(award, be good for business)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(award, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(award, has quality good)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(award, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(award, has quality good)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(award, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(award, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(award, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(award, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(award, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(award, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(award, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.50
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(award, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(recognition, has quality bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(award, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(recognition, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(award, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(trophy, has quality bad)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(award, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(scholarship, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(award, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(best, has quality help)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(award, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(best, has quality start)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(award, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(best, has quality worth)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(award, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(trophy, be bad for environment)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(award, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(recognition, has quality bad)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(award, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(recognition, has quality good)