axon: be important in communication

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents nerve fiber
Weight: 0.47
, structure
Weight: 0.42
, process
Weight: 0.41
, central nervous system
Weight: 0.37
, nervous system
Weight: 0.36
Siblings optic nerve
Weight: 0.32
, extracellular matrix
Weight: 0.31
, vesicle
Weight: 0.31
, phagocytosis
Weight: 0.31
, lipid bilayer
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in communication 1.00
be in communication 0.97
be important in neural communication 0.80
be important understanding 0.78
be important in business 0.76
be important in technology 0.75
be important for function 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(structure, be important understanding)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(axon, be important in communication)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(process, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(axon, be important in communication)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(structure, be important in technology)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(axon, be important in communication)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(process, be in communication)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(axon, be important in communication)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(axon, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(process, be in communication)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(axon, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(structure, be important understanding)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(axon, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(process, be important in business)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(axon, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(structure, be important in technology)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(axon, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(structure, be important understanding)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(axon, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(process, be important in business)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(axon, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(process, be in communication)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(axon, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(structure, be important in technology)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(structure, be important understanding)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(axon, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(axon, be important in communication)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(process, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(axon, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(axon, be important in communication)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(structure, be important in technology)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(axon, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(axon, be important in communication)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(process, be in communication)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(axon, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(axon, be important in communication)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(axon, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(axon, be important in communication)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(axon, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(axon, be important in neural communication)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(axon, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(axon, be important in neural communication)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(axon, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(axon, be important in neural communication)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(axon, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(axon, be important in neural communication)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(axon, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(axon, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(axon, be important in communication)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(axon, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(axon, be important in communication)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(axon, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(process, be in communication)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(axon, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(structure, be important understanding)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(axon, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(structure, be important in technology)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(axon, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(process, be important in business)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(axon, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(process, be in communication)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(axon, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(structure, be important understanding)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(axon, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(process, be important in business)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(axon, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(structure, be important in technology)