baboon: has physical part fangs

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents monkey
Weight: 0.77
, primate
Weight: 0.67
, mammal
Weight: 0.67
, animal
Weight: 0.60
Siblings rhino
Weight: 0.37
, spider monkey
Weight: 0.37
, zebra
Weight: 0.37
, chimpanzee
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part fangs 1.00
has physical part teeth 0.86
show teeth 0.80
have sharp teeth 0.79
has physical part tails 0.78
has physical part snouts 0.77
has physical part butt 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(primate, has physical part fangs)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(baboon, has physical part fangs)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(baboon, has physical part fangs)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(monkey, have sharp teeth)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(baboon, has physical part fangs)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(primate, show teeth)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(baboon, has physical part fangs)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(primate, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(baboon, has physical part fangs)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(mammal, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(baboon, has physical part fangs)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(monkey, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(baboon, has physical part fangs)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(baboon, has physical part fangs)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(primate, has physical part fangs)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(baboon, has physical part fangs)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(monkey, has physical part tails)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(baboon, has physical part fangs)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(primate, show teeth)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(baboon, has physical part fangs)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(monkey, have sharp teeth)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(baboon, has physical part fangs)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(mammal, has physical part tails)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(baboon, has physical part fangs)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(primate, has physical part tails)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(baboon, has physical part fangs)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(animal, has physical part tails)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(baboon, has physical part fangs)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(primate, show teeth)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(baboon, has physical part fangs)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(monkey, have sharp teeth)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(baboon, has physical part fangs)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(monkey, has physical part tails)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(baboon, has physical part fangs)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(mammal, has physical part tails)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(baboon, has physical part fangs)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(primate, has physical part fangs)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(baboon, has physical part fangs)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(primate, has physical part tails)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(baboon, has physical part fangs)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(animal, has physical part tails)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(baboon, has physical part fangs)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(spider monkey, has physical part tails)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(primate, has physical part fangs)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(baboon, has physical part fangs)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(baboon, has physical part fangs)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(baboon, has physical part fangs)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(baboon, has physical part fangs)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(primate, show teeth)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(baboon, has physical part fangs)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(baboon, has physical part fangs)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(monkey, have sharp teeth)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(baboon, has physical part fangs)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(baboon, has physical part fangs)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(primate, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(baboon, has physical part fangs)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(baboon, has physical part fangs)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(mammal, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(baboon, has physical part fangs)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(baboon, has physical part fangs)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(monkey, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(baboon, has physical part fangs)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(baboon, has physical part fangs)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(baboon, has physical part fangs)
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(spider monkey, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(spider monkey, has physical part tails)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(baboon, has physical part fangs)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(baboon, has physical part fangs)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(baboon, has physical part fangs)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(baboon, has physical part teeth)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(baboon, has physical part fangs)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(baboon, has physical part teeth)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(baboon, has physical part fangs)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(baboon, show teeth)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(baboon, has physical part fangs)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(baboon, has physical part teeth)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(baboon, has physical part fangs)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(baboon, has physical part teeth)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(baboon, has physical part fangs)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(baboon, have sharp teeth)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(baboon, has physical part fangs)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(baboon, has physical part tails)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(baboon, has physical part fangs)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(baboon, show teeth)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(baboon, has physical part fangs)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(baboon, has physical part tails)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(baboon, has physical part fangs)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(baboon, has physical part tails)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(baboon, has physical part fangs)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(baboon, have sharp teeth)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(baboon, has physical part fangs)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(baboon, show teeth)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(baboon, has physical part fangs)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(baboon, has physical part tails)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(baboon, has physical part fangs)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(baboon, have sharp teeth)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(baboon, has physical part fangs)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(baboon, have sharp teeth)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(baboon, has physical part fangs)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(baboon, show teeth)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(baboon, has physical part fangs)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(baboon, has physical part fangs)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(baboon, has physical part fangs)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(baboon, has physical part fangs)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(baboon, has physical part fangs)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(baboon, has physical part fangs)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(primate, has physical part fangs)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(baboon, has physical part fangs)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(primate, has physical part tails)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(baboon, has physical part fangs)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(mammal, has physical part tails)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(baboon, has physical part fangs)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(monkey, has physical part tails)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(baboon, has physical part fangs)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(primate, show teeth)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(baboon, has physical part fangs)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(monkey, have sharp teeth)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(baboon, has physical part fangs)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, has physical part tails)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(baboon, has physical part fangs)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(spider monkey, has physical part tails)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(baboon, has physical part fangs)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(primate, has physical part fangs)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(baboon, has physical part fangs)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(primate, has physical part tails)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(baboon, has physical part fangs)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(mammal, has physical part tails)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(baboon, has physical part fangs)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(monkey, has physical part tails)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(baboon, has physical part fangs)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(primate, show teeth)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(baboon, has physical part fangs)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(monkey, have sharp teeth)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(baboon, has physical part fangs)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, has physical part tails)