babylon: was famous

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents empire
Weight: 0.60
, song
Weight: 0.58
, place
Weight: 0.55
, city
Weight: 0.53
, civilization
Weight: 0.52
Siblings roman empire
Weight: 0.34
, love song
Weight: 0.33
, venice
Weight: 0.32
, monaco
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
was famous 1.00
is famous 0.96
was important to chaldeans 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(babylon, was famous)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(venice, is famous)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(babylon, was famous)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(monaco, is famous)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(babylon, was famous)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(monaco, is famous)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(monaco, is famous)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(babylon, was famous)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(venice, is famous)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(venice, is famous)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(babylon, was famous)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(babylon, was famous)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(babylon, was famous)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(babylon, is famous)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(babylon, was famous)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(babylon, is famous)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(babylon, was famous)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(babylon, is famous)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(babylon, was famous)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(babylon, is famous)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(babylon, was famous)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(babylon, was important to chaldeans)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(babylon, was famous)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(babylon, was important to chaldeans)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(babylon, was famous)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(babylon, was important to chaldeans)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(babylon, was famous)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(babylon, was important to chaldeans)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(babylon, was famous)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(babylon, was famous)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(babylon, was famous)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(babylon, was famous)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(babylon, was famous)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(babylon, was famous)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(monaco, is famous)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(babylon, was famous)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(venice, is famous)