babysitter: be rated ma

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents job
Weight: 0.64
, child
Weight: 0.59
, thing
Weight: 0.58
, family
Weight: 0.58
Siblings boyfriend
Weight: 0.35
, toddler
Weight: 0.35
, girlfriend
Weight: 0.35
, girl
Weight: 0.35
, aunt
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be rated ma 1.00
be rated tv ma 0.95
is tv ma 0.86
be rated tv-ma 0.83
be rated 15 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(babysitter, be rated ma)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(babysitter, be rated ma)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(babysitter, be rated ma)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(babysitter, be rated tv ma)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(babysitter, be rated ma)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(babysitter, is tv ma)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(babysitter, be rated ma)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(babysitter, be rated tv-ma)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(babysitter, be rated ma)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(babysitter, be rated tv ma)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(babysitter, be rated ma)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(babysitter, be rated 15)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(babysitter, be rated ma)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(babysitter, is tv ma)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(babysitter, be rated ma)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(babysitter, be rated tv-ma)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(babysitter, be rated ma)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(babysitter, be rated tv-ma)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(babysitter, be rated ma)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(babysitter, is tv ma)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(babysitter, be rated ma)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(babysitter, be rated tv ma)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(babysitter, be rated ma)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(babysitter, be rated 15)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(babysitter, be rated ma)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(babysitter, be rated tv-ma)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(babysitter, be rated ma)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(babysitter, is tv ma)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(babysitter, be rated ma)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(babysitter, be rated 15)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(babysitter, be rated ma)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(babysitter, be rated tv ma)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(babysitter, be rated ma)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(babysitter, be rated 15)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(babysitter, be rated ma)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(babysitter, be rated ma)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(babysitter, be rated ma)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(babysitter, be rated ma)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(babysitter, be rated ma)