bach: is great

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents musician
Weight: 0.63
, artist
Weight: 0.61
, genius
Weight: 0.58
, work
Weight: 0.55
Siblings billy joel
Weight: 0.33
, paul simon
Weight: 0.32
, paul mccartney
Weight: 0.32
, billy
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is great 1.00
was great 0.97
is best 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(bach, is great)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(paul mccartney, is great)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(bach, is great)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(paul mccartney, is great)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(paul mccartney, is great)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(bach, is great)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(bach, is great)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(bach, is great)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(bach, was great)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(bach, is great)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(bach, was great)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(bach, is great)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(bach, was great)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(bach, is great)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(bach, is best)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(bach, is great)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(bach, was great)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(bach, is great)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(bach, is best)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(bach, is great)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(bach, is best)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(bach, is great)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(bach, is best)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(bach, is great)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(bach, is great)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(bach, is great)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(bach, is great)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(bach, is great)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(bach, is great)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(paul mccartney, is great)