back: is short

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents body part
Weight: 0.64
, side
Weight: 0.63
, part
Weight: 0.62
, hit
Weight: 0.59
Siblings down
Weight: 0.35
, out
Weight: 0.34
, big toe
Weight: 0.33
, away
Weight: 0.33
, here
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is short 1.00
be on long top 0.76
have short careers 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(side, be on long top)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(back, is short)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(back, is short)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(side, be on long top)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(back, is short)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(side, be on long top)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(side, be on long top)
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(back, is short)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(back, is short)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(back, is short)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(back, is short)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(back, is short)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(back, have short careers)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(back, is short)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(back, have short careers)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(back, is short)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(back, have short careers)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(back, is short)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(back, have short careers)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(back, is short)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(back, is short)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(back, is short)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(back, is short)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(back, is short)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(back, is short)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(side, be on long top)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(back, is short)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(side, be on long top)