bacteria: be at forest

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents microorganism
Weight: 0.53
, organism
Weight: 0.51
, life
Weight: 0.19
Siblings fungus
Weight: 0.34
, germ
Weight: 0.34
, algae
Weight: 0.34
, amoeba
Weight: 0.34
, yeast
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at forest 1.00
be at forest environment 0.91
be at wet forest 0.91
be at pine forest 0.90
be at dense forest 0.88
be at forest on dead tree 0.88
be at rain forest 0.88
be at damp forest 0.87
be at michigan forest 0.83
be at woodland 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(life, be at forest)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(bacteria, be at forest)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(bacteria, be at forest)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(life, be at forest)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.55
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(bacteria, be at forest)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(life, be at forest)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(bacteria, be at forest)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(fungus, be at forest)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(bacteria, be at forest)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(fungus, be at pine forest)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(bacteria, be at forest)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(fungus, be at forest on dead tree)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(bacteria, be at forest)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(fungus, be at damp forest)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(bacteria, be at forest)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(fungus, be at woodland)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(life, be at forest)
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(bacteria, be at forest)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(bacteria, be at forest)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(bacteria, be at forest)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(fungus, be at forest)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(fungus, be at forest)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(bacteria, be at forest)
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(fungus, be at pine forest)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(fungus, be at pine forest)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(bacteria, be at forest)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(fungus, be at forest on dead tree)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(fungus, be at forest on dead tree)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(bacteria, be at forest)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(fungus, be at damp forest)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(fungus, be at damp forest)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(bacteria, be at forest)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(fungus, be at woodland)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(fungus, be at woodland)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(bacteria, be at forest)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(bacteria, be at forest)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(bacteria, be at forest)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(bacteria, be at forest)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(bacteria, be at forest)

Typical implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(bacteria, be at forest)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(bacteria, be at forest)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(bacteria, be at forest)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(life, be at forest)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(bacteria, be at forest)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(fungus, be at forest)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(bacteria, be at forest)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(fungus, be at damp forest)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(bacteria, be at forest)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(fungus, be at pine forest)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(bacteria, be at forest)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(fungus, be at forest on dead tree)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(bacteria, be at forest)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(fungus, be at woodland)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(bacteria, be at forest)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(life, be at forest)