bad breath: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents problem
Weight: 0.67
, symptom
Weight: 0.67
, thing
Weight: 0.66
, condition
Weight: 0.64
, issue
Weight: 0.61
Siblings breath
Weight: 0.37
, bad food
Weight: 0.36
, good person
Weight: 0.35
, good book
Weight: 0.35
, good luck
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality jokes 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(bad breath, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(good person, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(bad breath, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(breath, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(bad breath, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(breath, has quality jokes)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(bad breath, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(good person, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(good person, has quality bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(bad breath, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(breath, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(breath, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(bad breath, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(breath, has quality jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(breath, has quality jokes)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(bad breath, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(bad breath, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(bad breath, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(bad breath, has quality jokes)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(bad breath, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(bad breath, has quality jokes)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(bad breath, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(bad breath, has quality jokes)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(bad breath, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(bad breath, has quality jokes)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(bad breath, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(bad breath, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(bad breath, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(bad breath, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(bad breath, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(bad breath, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(good person, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(bad breath, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(breath, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(bad breath, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(breath, has quality jokes)