bad: has quality right

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tv show
Weight: 0.65
, hit
Weight: 0.60
, television series
Weight: 0.55
, television show
Weight: 0.53
, protein
Weight: 0.52
Siblings big brother
Weight: 0.33
, talk show
Weight: 0.33
, cold case
Weight: 0.32
, big bang theory
Weight: 0.32
, game show
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality right 1.00
has quality good 0.90
has quality bad 0.88
is quality 0.87
has time now 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(protein, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(bad, has quality right)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(hit, is quality)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(bad, has quality right)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(protein, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(bad, has quality right)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(bad, has quality right)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(protein, has quality bad)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(bad, has quality right)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(hit, is quality)
0.00
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.03
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(bad, has quality right)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(protein, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.52
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(bad, has quality right)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(protein, has quality good)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(bad, has quality right)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(protein, has quality bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(bad, has quality right)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(hit, is quality)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(bad, has quality right)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(big brother, has quality good)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(bad, has quality right)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(big bang theory, has quality good)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(bad, has quality right)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(talk show, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(protein, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(bad, has quality right)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(bad, has quality right)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(protein, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(bad, has quality right)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(bad, has quality right)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(hit, is quality)
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(bad, has quality right)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(bad, has quality right)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(bad, has quality right)
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(big bang theory, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(big bang theory, has quality good)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(bad, has quality right)
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(big brother, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(big brother, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(bad, has quality right)
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(talk show, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(talk show, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(bad, has quality right)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(bad, has quality right)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(bad, has quality right)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(bad, has quality good)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(bad, has quality right)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(bad, has quality good)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(bad, has quality right)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(bad, has quality good)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(bad, has quality right)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(bad, is quality)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(bad, has quality right)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(bad, is quality)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(bad, has quality right)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(bad, is quality)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(bad, has quality right)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(bad, has quality good)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(bad, has quality right)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(bad, is quality)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(bad, has quality right)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(bad, has time now)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(bad, has quality right)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(bad, has time now)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(bad, has quality right)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(bad, has time now)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(bad, has quality right)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(bad, has quality bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(bad, has quality right)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(bad, has time now)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(bad, has quality right)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(bad, has quality bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(bad, has quality right)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(bad, has quality bad)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(bad, has quality right)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(bad, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(bad, has quality right)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(bad, has quality right)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(bad, has quality right)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(bad, has quality right)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(bad, has quality right)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(bad, has quality right)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(protein, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(bad, has quality right)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(protein, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(bad, has quality right)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(hit, is quality)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(bad, has quality right)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(big bang theory, has quality good)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(bad, has quality right)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(big brother, has quality good)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(bad, has quality right)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(talk show, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(bad, has quality right)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(hit, is quality)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(bad, has quality right)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(protein, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(bad, has quality right)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(protein, has quality good)