badminton: be good game help

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents sport
Weight: 0.66
, game
Weight: 0.59
, thing
Weight: 0.56
, activity
Weight: 0.55
, event
Weight: 0.51
Siblings table tennis
Weight: 0.65
, tennis
Weight: 0.36
, tennis racket
Weight: 0.36
, snooker
Weight: 0.36
, squash
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good game help 1.00
is game 0.88
is interesting game 0.83
is video game 0.80
is good sport 0.76
have bad 0.76
has quality good 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(game, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(badminton, be good game help)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(sport, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(badminton, be good game help)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(badminton, be good game help)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(sport, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(badminton, be good game help)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(game, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(badminton, be good game help)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(game, has quality good)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(badminton, be good game help)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(sport, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(badminton, be good game help)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(tennis, is game)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(badminton, be good game help)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(table tennis, is game)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(badminton, be good game help)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(table tennis, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(badminton, be good game help)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(tennis, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(game, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(badminton, be good game help)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(badminton, be good game help)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(sport, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(badminton, be good game help)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(badminton, be good game help)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(badminton, be good game help)
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(table tennis, is game)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(table tennis, is game)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(badminton, be good game help)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(tennis, is game)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(tennis, is game)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(badminton, be good game help)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(tennis, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(tennis, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(badminton, be good game help)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(table tennis, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(table tennis, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(badminton, be good game help)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(badminton, be good game help)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(badminton, be good game help)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(badminton, is game)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(badminton, be good game help)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(badminton, is video game)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(badminton, be good game help)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(badminton, is video game)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(badminton, be good game help)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(badminton, is video game)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(badminton, be good game help)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(badminton, is video game)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(badminton, be good game help)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(badminton, is game)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(badminton, be good game help)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(badminton, is game)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(badminton, be good game help)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(badminton, is interesting game)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(badminton, be good game help)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(badminton, is good sport)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(badminton, be good game help)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(badminton, have bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(badminton, be good game help)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(badminton, has quality good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(badminton, be good game help)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(badminton, is interesting game)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(badminton, be good game help)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(badminton, is good sport)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(badminton, be good game help)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(badminton, have bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(badminton, be good game help)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(badminton, have bad)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(badminton, be good game help)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(badminton, is interesting game)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(badminton, be good game help)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(badminton, have bad)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(badminton, be good game help)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(badminton, is good sport)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(badminton, be good game help)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(badminton, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(badminton, be good game help)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(badminton, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(badminton, be good game help)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(badminton, is interesting game)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(badminton, be good game help)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(badminton, is game)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(badminton, be good game help)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(badminton, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(badminton, be good game help)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(badminton, is good sport)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(badminton, be good game help)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(badminton, be good game help)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(badminton, be good game help)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(badminton, be good game help)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(badminton, be good game help)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(badminton, be good game help)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(sport, has quality good)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(badminton, be good game help)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(game, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(badminton, be good game help)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(table tennis, is game)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(badminton, be good game help)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(tennis, is game)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(badminton, be good game help)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(tennis, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(badminton, be good game help)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(table tennis, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(badminton, be good game help)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(sport, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(badminton, be good game help)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(game, has quality good)